Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Toure Neblett: Slavery Is Partly to Blame for High Black Unemployment Rate
NewsBusters ^

Posted on 08/23/2013 7:55:15 AM PDT by chessplayer

As our dear friends at Twitchy observed, Neblett on Wednesday had some things to say about the black unemployment rate both nationally and in specific parts of the country.

Follower MojoMoe retweeted one saying "Blame slavery."

Neblett - who's actually a co-host of a nationally televised, weekday program on a so-called cable "news" network! - retweeted MojoMoe's pathetic comment and added, "That's obviously part of it."

Never mind that the 13th Amendment abolished slavery on December 6, 1865 almost 150 years ago.

Did I mention that this genius is a host on a nationally televised cable "news" network?


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blackkk; florida; georgezimmerman; trayvonmartin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-156 last
To: Bidimus1

The law banning importation of slaves after 1808 was enforced by the United States Navy. The Navy kept a squadron of war ships off the West African coast from 1819 to 1861 specifically to prevent slave ships from delivering their cargos to the new world. In the 1840s a second squadron was added to patrol off the coast of Brazil. In the 1850s a squadron started anti slave trade patrols in the Caribbean.
The Navy’s success was not great, only about 100 slave ships were seized during the 42 years active anti-slave patrolling. By comparison, the Royal Navy captured over 1600 slave ships. Of course the Royal Navy was considerably larger than our Navy during those years.


141 posted on 08/24/2013 4:54:39 AM PDT by X Fretensis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

“I’ll have those niggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years.” - Lyndon Baines Johnson about the Great Society Socialism plan.


142 posted on 08/24/2013 5:07:02 AM PDT by newfreep (Breitbart sent me...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: X Fretensis
read Lincoln's proposed 13th amendment.
the north wanted to tax the south at a 40% rate the south would only agree to 10% also tell what you think the war was about
143 posted on 08/24/2013 6:49:45 AM PDT by jrd (All federal acts,laws,orders,rules regulations regarding firearms, infringe the 2 amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: jrd

Lincoln’s 13th Amendment. “No amendment shall be made to the Constitution which will authorize or give to Congress the power to abolish or interfere, within any State, with the domestic institutions or service by thereof, including that of persons held to labor or service by the laws of said State.” This is the 13th Amendment (AKA the Corwin Amendment) that President Lincoln sent to the States for ratification in March 1861. Only the State of Ohio actually ratified this amendment. I see nothing about any taxes in this amendment. Maybe you would be so kind as to provide the text of “Lincoln’s proposed 13th amendment” you are referring to.


144 posted on 08/24/2013 10:43:47 AM PDT by X Fretensis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: X Fretensis

Why don’t you just tell me why the Civil war came about. that seems to be what you want to do!


145 posted on 08/24/2013 1:00:15 PM PDT by jrd (All federal acts,laws,orders,rules regulations regarding firearms, infringe the 2 amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: jrd

What I want, is for you to answer the question that I asked concerning your post 33. What states rights had the Federal Government violated so seriously that secession and Civil War were the only answer. I am sure you have a well document list of the states rights violations by the Buchanan administration that lead the Southern states to secede. I would like to know what they were.


146 posted on 08/24/2013 4:38:22 PM PDT by X Fretensis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

The kind that can make an error and admit it. I did err.

also the kind that agreed with San Houston about session

Let me tell you what is coming. After the sacrifice of countless millions of treasure and hundreds of thousands of lives, you may win Southern independence if God be not against you, but I doubt it. I tell you that, while I believe with you in the doctrine of states rights, the North is determined to preserve this Union. They are not a fiery, impulsive people as you are, for they live in colder climates. But when they begin to move in a given direction, they move with the steady momentum and perseverance of a mighty avalanche; and what I fear is, they will overwhelm the South.

oh and the kind that thinks the CSA was a moral abyss as most of its claims really came down to the POWER to Own another person

Born Ft. Worth.
Grand Father served 36th Div Italy


147 posted on 08/24/2013 10:51:56 PM PDT by Bidimus1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Bidimus1; Pelham; CatherineofAragon

You are one big giant imaginative reach boy son

Don Quixote slaying mean old southern windmills stamping out racism pell mell
Totally blissfully ignorant of your own bigotry and prejudice

Its all about white racism for you....how sad.......the world crumbles around you and you’ve found a cost free way to feel superior to others simply by talking in platitudes

How original

Truly...you can’t think for yourself

You are no southerner young man....likely your folks are my age and fled Flint or Dearborn for Texas in the 80s

Hope you read I Have A Dream over and over today...lol

If you want to continue arguing with me.....do it over what I wrote not what you like to imagine like that fantasy that made you so proud that Texas sent as many to Federals as to CSA

Go hang with X or Sherman Logan and bone up then get back to me grasshopper


148 posted on 08/25/2013 1:37:11 AM PDT by wardaddy (the next Dark Ages are coming as Western Civilization crumbles with nary a whimper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Bidimus1

“Or it imposed as the highest law of the land that some people were not people.”

Wow, you are purposefully willing to remain ignorant and obtuse. This statement shows your idoctrination and willingness to stay in that state of thinking.

“That you take the most positive view is nice but it is not the only view.”

I take the historically accurate view, it is easy enough to research as the founders intentions were very well documented.


149 posted on 08/26/2013 6:35:35 AM PDT by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

“SO while they did not resolve the issue except to leave the institution as it was, they did not impose it; it did not begin with them.”

In addition, the founders recognized that the issue of slavery must be eliminated at some time and they were able to incorporate the very tools to ammend the constitution. Had they insisted on eliminating slavery as part of the original union, then the union would have never occured. Without this union resulting in the United States, then there would not have been a United States that elminated slavery.


150 posted on 08/26/2013 6:45:05 AM PDT by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: CSM
The intentions of course being far less important than the results. That road of good intentions being well known.

Your claim that I am ignorant is some what laughable, the fact that I disagree with you does not mean I do not know how the sausauge was made.

151 posted on 08/26/2013 6:55:26 AM PDT by Bidimus1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: X Fretensis
For which the US can be rightly proud. A 1/2 measure to be sure but still 1/2 a loaf is better than none.
That the founders hope that this would end slavery was not succesful was easy to for see but it was at least a try.
152 posted on 08/26/2013 7:02:47 AM PDT by Bidimus1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: CSM
The laws of the US maintained the state of slavery, imposing that state of servitude by force of law. To claim otherwise is to refute the clear historical record.
Just googgle USA slave laws Fugitive Slave Law of 1793 And of course the us constitution
“ No person held to service or labour in one state, under the laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in consequence of any law or regulation therein, be discharged from such service or labour, but shall be delivered up on claim of the party to whom such service or labour may be due”
--- Fugitive Slave Act of 1793 was the law implementing and imposing the section of this constitution
153 posted on 08/26/2013 7:30:40 AM PDT by Bidimus1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Bidimus1

Would there have been a union if slavery was outlawed immediately?


154 posted on 08/26/2013 8:16:45 AM PDT by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Bidimus1

agreed.


155 posted on 08/26/2013 1:08:17 PM PDT by X Fretensis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

Well, it’s true in many ways. Slavery was a Democrat institution, and certainly the Democrat party has consistently done everything it can to destroy black prosperity or progress since then. In a more literal sense, it’s true because the minimum wage — a form of slavery — increases unemployment for every demographic.


156 posted on 08/26/2013 1:12:52 PM PDT by Sloth (Rather than a lesser Evil, I voted for Goode.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-156 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson