Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Toure Neblett: Slavery Is Partly to Blame for High Black Unemployment Rate
NewsBusters ^

Posted on 08/23/2013 7:55:15 AM PDT by chessplayer

As our dear friends at Twitchy observed, Neblett on Wednesday had some things to say about the black unemployment rate both nationally and in specific parts of the country.

Follower MojoMoe retweeted one saying "Blame slavery."

Neblett - who's actually a co-host of a nationally televised, weekday program on a so-called cable "news" network! - retweeted MojoMoe's pathetic comment and added, "That's obviously part of it."

Never mind that the 13th Amendment abolished slavery on December 6, 1865 almost 150 years ago.

Did I mention that this genius is a host on a nationally televised cable "news" network?


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blackkk; florida; georgezimmerman; trayvonmartin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-156 next last
To: Bidimus1; Squantos; mrsmel; CatherineofAragon; Pelham

Where on my profile page do I defend slavery?

I like Bedford Forrest...read about him and slavery and the end of his life

You don’t know me...you are surmising

My views on seccession and the civil war are more nuanced and contextual

I do not think slavery is the worst of human behavior ever and certainly not as practiced in north America

It is agonized over since whites mostly did it and whites are held to a higher standard.

The war was a culmination of decades of contention with expansion of slavery likely the major but not sole issue

The war was fought by the north to prevent the south from leaving and by the south against an invading force at which point why it started becomes less significant

It should have been avoided...fire eaters and radical GOP were just twins opposed

Lincoln....I’m ambivalent....his terms were generous... but he made the Leviathan a reality..

Both sides were equally racist....not that I particularly care

Sherman did indeed commit war crimes in my view yet his terms rejected by the radicals were decent

In the end...a lot of good countrymen of shared DNA and culture died.....and should have been avoided

And for what.....this stupid crap today....white culture under assault

Socialism and our cities war zones

Open borders

When the brown wave takes over your state...and they will....and Holder is doing his best

It will be lost for all of us....Juan Seguin will be considered a traitor to LA sangre and the Alamo and San Jacinto and Goliad like some Nazi site of the oppressive Anglo

Long may your Bonnie Blue lone Star wave but all will save you guys is decent Yankees move in enough for work to offset la raza

If it goes South...lol....you’ll know how I feel


121 posted on 08/23/2013 3:52:56 PM PDT by wardaddy (the next Dark Ages are coming as Western Civilization crumbles with nary a whimper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: X Fretensis

my understanding is the north was telling the south what they could and could not do


122 posted on 08/23/2013 4:08:25 PM PDT by jrd (All federal acts,laws,orders,rules regulations regarding firearms, infringe the 2 amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: ne1410s
Bush’s fault...

"Lincoln's Fault™ - for when it's just too damned important to blame on Bush"

/s

123 posted on 08/23/2013 4:09:30 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: All

Gimmie an R.E.P.A.R.A.T.I.O.N.S.. what does is spell.. Race war.


124 posted on 08/23/2013 4:11:07 PM PDT by newnhdad (Our new motto: USA, it was fun while it lasted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


             

125 posted on 08/23/2013 4:13:19 PM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bidimus1

Well stated Bidimus1. Of course there will always be those with a perpetual chip on their shoulder that blinds them from the truth.


126 posted on 08/23/2013 4:15:52 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: chessplayer

The only slavery is the Democrat Party Porch called WELFARE. Blacks are just too dumb to get that. As Rush says, you can’t defeat Santa Clause, meaning, there are some people stupid enough to sell out their future for cheap welfare in exchange for their vote.


127 posted on 08/23/2013 4:18:43 PM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bidimus1

Playing dumb is stupid. You should know that a strawman argument is one whereby the other guy claims something the other person never said and demands they defend it. Playing dumb is for liberals. Are you a liberal?


128 posted on 08/23/2013 4:22:26 PM PDT by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

Maybe they don’t realize they are free.
I lived in south Philly till I was 14, never realized I was free to leave. :)


129 posted on 08/23/2013 4:23:18 PM PDT by Palio di Siena
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bandleader

Oh please my ahole racist peer said all the black on black killings is because of slavery and that there is still rage over that.


130 posted on 08/23/2013 4:24:42 PM PDT by 1217Chic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
"The Rats keep their minds enslaved alright.

That is correct.!! The democrats need poverty in much the same way that policemen need crime...

131 posted on 08/23/2013 4:31:11 PM PDT by unread (Ecc. 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy

I stated that you supported the CSA I said nothing about slavery, but as the CSA is hand in glove I can see how you might have conflated my statement


132 posted on 08/23/2013 5:07:11 PM PDT by Bidimus1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Bidimus1; Squantos
I'm not apologetic for the south or slavery nor feel any need to be

I would have preferred there not be a war

If that means to you I am a CSA supporter unequivocally then you are a stranger to context

I do know I am southern and proud of it and our past

Northerners...non southerners most who were not here then are not my moral superior but on average many are my cultural inferior.....they are progressives exponentially more likely than we are

Now you've got something more to work with...the white South and a few rural states are the last redoubt

You must be young to believe the narrative

I was a left meaning libertarian in my long haired youth

But my culture was not under attack then like now

Neos like beck and Levin and others....some of whom I like otherwise see race as our crucible and the demonization of my group as the cleansing agent from which to purge all of Americas politically incorrect transgressions by the white male dominated Christian culture

I am not gonna cotton to that

And if you truly are southern born and bred and do....well...that's sad

For disclosure I love Texas ...lived off turtle creek as a young boy....have kinfolks in Pritchett.....a love once from Abilene and a good pal in Pampa

goddaughter in Silsbee

And so forth

Texas is Dixie and the west starts halfway tween Dallas and Fort Worth

Your destiny is ours trust me.....careful what u wish for

133 posted on 08/23/2013 5:40:55 PM PDT by wardaddy (the next Dark Ages are coming as Western Civilization crumbles with nary a whimper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: unread

Challenge a Rats sometime with this: If the Democrats are for poor people, then they need people to stay poor to get their power. And, if the Republicans are for the rich man it stands to reason that they need more rich people to stay in power. So, which party wants you to get rich and which wants you to stay poor?


134 posted on 08/23/2013 6:07:42 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the people. T Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Bidimus1; CSM

““The 3/5th person is about as imposed as it gets.””

“Or it imposed as the highest law of the land that some people were not people.”

The claim that the 3/5 compromise means that slaves were not regarded as people is the sort of nonsense that current generations tell themselves in order to puff up their vanity. It’s vanity based on ignorance, which makes it all the more risible.

The slave States wanted slaves counted as persons. Congressional seats were apportioned on population, and having slaves counted increased their number of House seats.

The anti-slavery States didn’t want slaves counted because they didn’t want slave States to get more representation in the House.

The 3/5 compromise had nothing to do with whether or not slaves were people. It had everything to do with whether or not they were to be counted for the purpose of electing Representatives to Congress.


135 posted on 08/23/2013 9:09:51 PM PDT by Pelham (Deportation is the law. When it's not enforced you get California)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Bidimus1
One more time. then I am done trying to explain this.

The institution of slavery was thousands of years old before the founders were born.

The institution of slavery existed on these shores before the first European ever set foot here, as it did in the rest of the world.

Slavery did not originate with the founders.

Because slavery did not originate with the Founders, they did not impose (v, to establish, force or inflict something on someone) slavery on anyone.

For those sold in bondage on these shores, the imposition of their status occurred before they were loaded on the boat (they were already slaves when they arrived, only their ownership changed).

The Founders did not do that.

What the Founders did accomplish was to lay the foundations of a government based on human rights which eventually abolished the institution of slavery.

Blaming the founders for slavery makes as much sense as demanding reparations for the institution from people who never owned slaves, and in many cases, whose ancestors were not even here at the time the practice existed.

136 posted on 08/23/2013 9:16:02 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
One does not have to originate something to impose it. The laws against murder were not created by the founders but the US IMPOSED the legal sticture against it. o·rig·i·nate [uh-rij-uh-neyt] Show IPA verb, o·rig·i·nat·ed, o·rig·i·nat·ing. verb (used without object) 1. to take its origin or rise; begin; start; arise: The practice originated during the Middle Ages. 2. (of a train, bus, or other public conveyance) to begin a scheduled run at a specified place: This train originates at Philadelphia. verb (used with object) 3. to give origin or rise to; initiate; invent: to originate a better method. Origin: 1645–55; probably back formation from origination (< F) < Latin orīginātiō etymology; see origin, -ate1 , ion Collins English Dictionary - Complete & Unabridged 10th Edition to wit originate To bring into being; create. To come into being; start. The American Heritage® Stedman's Medical Dictionary Copyright © 2002, 2001, 1995 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. vs. im·pose verb (used with object) 1. to lay on or set as something to be borne, endured, obeyed, fulfilled, paid, etc.: to impose taxes. 2. to put or set by or as if by authority: to impose one's personal preference on others.
137 posted on 08/23/2013 11:18:03 PM PDT by Bidimus1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

Fixed for readability

One does not have to originate something to impose it. The laws against murder were not created by the founders but the US IMPOSED the legal sticture against it.

o·rig·i·nate

1. to take its origin or rise; begin; start; arise: The practice originated during the Middle Ages.

2. (of a train, bus, or other public conveyance) to begin a scheduled run at a specified place: This train originates at Philadelphia. verb (used with object)

3. to give origin or rise to; initiate; invent: to originate a better method.

Collins English Dictionary - Complete & Unabridged 10th Edition

VS

im·pose verb (used with object)

1. to lay on or set as something to be borne, endured, obeyed, fulfilled, paid, etc.: to impose taxes.

2. to put or set by or as if by authority: to impose one’s personal preference on others.

Dict.com


138 posted on 08/23/2013 11:24:37 PM PDT by Bidimus1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Bidimus1; Pelham; Squantos

By the way that is an outright lie you submit that Texas sent as many men to the Union as to the CSA

70,000 to the CSA

2,000 to the Union

What sort of Texan are you again?

An interloper type

You should meet Breckenridge

Don’t fumble too much...even your fellow Neos will throw you under the bus....shucks... some of them are scholars you know


139 posted on 08/24/2013 1:50:37 AM PDT by wardaddy (the next Dark Ages are coming as Western Civilization crumbles with nary a whimper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: jrd

What was the Federal Government telling the Southern states they could not do.


140 posted on 08/24/2013 4:44:55 AM PDT by X Fretensis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-156 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson