Agreed. A con-con is a nuclear device of unimaginable destructive power. It is not a panacea that will right all wrongs or fix everything. Once you open up a con-con, you could find yourself in a far worse position than what you started with. First off, the governor of the state will appoint the delegates in accordance with the numbers of electoral college votes he's alloted. Think of the huge electoral college states: California, New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Florida, Texas. Not many of those can be considered bastions of conservatism. Once a con-con has been opened there are no restraints on what can be changed in the document. There is no such thing as a limited con-con. You could alter or junk the entire document. How many potential delegates would you put on a par with the Founding Fathers? That group was assembled by God Almighty for the sole purpose of advancing HIS future agenda (among other things, the eventual creation of the State of Israel and the subsequent lighting the fuse to the End of Days) and we shall not see men or women of their quality and patriotism ever again.
IMO a Con Con at this time would result in the possible loss of the 1st, 2nd, 4th and 10th ammemdments.
As I stated before its a bad idea to the 10th power. Levin has not thought this through.
The only 2 ways back for this republic are through the 10th ammendment with the sovereign states or the bullet box. Sad but true.