Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tennessee Nana

You were a subject of the Queen, and the state at the time (New Zealand), had no desire to strip that status from their citizens.

The Commonwealth tends to treat Britain differently from the rest of the world (for obvious reasons).


41 posted on 08/20/2013 4:54:05 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: JCBreckenridge

No I was a subject of the king


45 posted on 08/20/2013 4:56:33 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: JCBreckenridge

She would have been a subject of the King, not the Queen. Liz didn’t become Queen until 1952, after her father died.


66 posted on 08/20/2013 8:29:17 PM PDT by oldweesie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson