"What difference does it make?"
R
Losing an ambassador would make Obama look like John Wayne? Not the John Wayne I saw in the movies. It might make Obama look like Jerry Lewis....in a humorless way.
I would not doubt it in the least, in-the-least. Since day one this bum has done nothing but side with the muzzies while doing everything humanly possible to destroy this country. The enemy within, and being that we no longer have a Republican party but a bunch of RINOs who cower into a fetal position anytime the Kenyan King snaps his fingers, absolutely nothing is done about it.
I have a real hard time believing that the opposition party didn’t know this stuff shortly after it happened. I mean they DO sit on the intel committees right?
Each day passes and another thing emerges that shows the vapidity of ‘our’ government.
"What difference does it make?"
R
bookmark
It isn’t really that complicated. Forget the video and the hoax about the kidnapping. Focus on what was stolen:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3053811/posts
Attorney for Whistleblower: 400 U.S. Missiles Stolen in Benghazi
breitbart.com ^ | 8/12/13 | AWR Hawkins
Posted on Monday, August 12, 2013 1:06:47 PM by ColdOne
On August 12, Joe DiGenova, attorney for one of the Benghazi whistleblowers, told Washington D.C.’s WMAL that one of the reasons people have remained tight-lipped about Benghazi is because 400 U.S. missiles were “diverted to Libya” and ended up being stolen and falling into “the hands of some very ugly people.”
DiGenova represents Benghazi whistleblower Mark Thompson. He told WMAL that he “does not know whether [the missiles] were at the annex, but it is clear the annex was somehow involved in the distribution of those missiles.”
He claimed his information “comes from a former intelligence official who stayed in constant contact with people in the special ops and intelligence community.” He said the biggest concern right now is finding those missiles before they can be put to use. “They are worried, specifically according to these sources, about an attempt to shoot down an airliner,” he claimed.
Also, focus on a tougher than Gitmo prison run by “local friends” of the CIA to get info from prisoners.
>Whoever gave the “stand down orders,” Jarrett, Obama, or the janitor, it was treason, and it all goes back to Obama.<
.
Treason huh? That’s a serious accusation.
Only Snowden can commit treason.
do an exchange for Ambassador Stevens and the Blind Sheik, ................................. BINGO!!!! I said that since day one. Also, no one spontaneously attacks with a 2 prong, heavy weapon supported envelopment maneuver unless they were trained and rehearsed. The mission was to get Stevens and trade. As afar as I am concerned the rest is just Political BS to cover up a failed leadership and to protect the potential next candidate.
Today’s “Hillary Benghazi Treachery” Google Index is: 4,220,000
Yesterday was: 4,210,000
Been saying since month one.....Barack Hussein Obama is the most intricately planned and most devastating terrorist attack to ever touch American soil. Maybe Benghazi is giving us a glimpse of who he follows and who orchestrated his career, the why is obvious, he is the Muslim Brotherhood.
If Obama’s Muslim friend Morsi gets into really deep problems in Egypt he can come back to the USA. In fact Obama could push the Muslimization of the USA along by making the case that either of Morsi’s sons who were born in the USA as he was(?) are eligible for POTUSA as some people in the USA including a whole lot of suit and burka Muslims could come out in the open and probably elect the son of Morsi.
Now the analogy will draw some heat but it is historically accurate ... remember the jokes in Hogan's Heroes about generals not daring to wake der Fuhrer? There were also passing references in many of the WWII films about generals whose spines turned to jello at the thought of having to awaken the boss. Well ...
Or perhaps VJ is such a good gatekeeper that the others acquiesced to her demand that the "boss" not be disturbed. Nah, strike that. She IS the boss and she said no. Maybe I should have been referring to Eva.
How it is possible to keep the lid on this mess? ... and it tells us something. Successfully suppressing this information and essentially all the details, for this amount of time is critical. WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE?
How is it our Senators, House of Representatives, the pentagon Brass, Generals, and the many people whose business it is to know the details, are locked away form the public?
God help us today. Forgive us, grant us truth and understanding of this situation, LORD we need Thy guidance, and protection. LET NOT EVIL PREVAIL!
We praise thee and honor Thee, and seek Thy face, in Jesus name, amen.
Clintoon and the head liar in the outhouse, have problems controlling even their liberal media re Benghazi.
There is no way they can control other outlets.
Below is a very interesting and different look at who might have been responsible for the killing of Ambassador Stephens and others at Benghazi, Assad.
Former Muslim Brotherhood Member tells us what the Government won’t about the Terror Attack in Benghazi
August 12, 2013
Dr. Mark Christian from the Global Faith Institute sent The Gateway Pundit his account of the Benghazi attack on September 11, 2012:
Syrian president Bashar el Assad, Russia, Iran, and Hezbollah of Lebanon are fully responsible for the death of United States Ambassador Christopher Stevens. President Obama has known this fact since the minute he first learned about the attack.
Stevens, from his Benghazi base, was stockpiling weapons - and resourcing the expert fighters who could use them - to topple Assad’s rule in Syria. On September 11, 2012, Assad powerfully punched back, raiding the Benghazi compound which housed the armament for his own destruction. Though Assad’s reprisal resulted in the loss of four American lives, including Stevens, he forcefully conveyed that he would not be thrown out of the ring.
The Syrian uprising is not a simple “the good guys vs. the bad guys” action-packed conflict. While there is plenty of action, there are no good guys. There are, however, two opponents who have been duking it out for hundreds of years, the Sunnis and the Shiites. In the Sunni corner, we have U.S. President Barack Obama, championed primarily by Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Egypt. Their combatants, the Shiites, include Syria, Iran, and Hezbollah - the Lebanese militia controlled by Iran and Syria.
Under President Barack Obama’s direction in the 2011 Arab Spring, the Sunnis had already ousted evil dictators from countries such as Egypt, Tunisia, and Libya. It appeared to be pro-democracy freedom-fighting at its finest. It wasn’t. The overthrown governments were quickly replaced with Muslim-Brotherhood-aligned, Sunni Islamic theocracies. And the next country on the list for overthrow was Syria. But unlike the easier targets of Mubarek, Ben Ali, and Gaddafi, Shiite Syrian leader Bashar Assad has the powerful allies of Iran, Hezbollah, and Russia.
The Assad regime was fully aware of the shrouded activity in Benghazi, fully aware that Ambassador Christopher Stevens, the man credited for the assassination of Gaddafi, was much more than an ambassador. Though serving in Tripoli as the U.S. Ambassador to transition a tribal Libya to Sunni Islamic rule, Stevens covertly used Benghazi as his base of operation for the next phase of Arab Spring: overthrowing Assad in Syria. From his Benghazi compound Stevens stored and supplied weapons for thousands of hired, rebel fighters - many of which were al-Qaeda - headed to Syria.