Posted on 08/06/2013 1:38:06 PM PDT by Perdogg
Federal prosecutors have filed the first charges in the Benghazi terror attack against Ahmed Khattalah, the leader of a Libyan militia believed to be responsible for the Sept. 11, 2012, consulate attack that killed four Americans.
The charges are under seal, CNN first reported.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Bout’ time...
Exactly. “Criminal” is just a way to get the murderers off, not to deal with anything. Shouldn’t have even announced this, we should have just gone in an “dealt” with them. This administration AND congress are mostly idiots who couldn’t find their noses on their faces.
Here’s why you NEVER going to get to the bottom of Benghazi-Gate, never. Too intimidating for a lot of folks!!!
Thanks, dan. I don’t agree with the premise, but only G-d knows right now. Chaos and corruption have completely eveloped this evil deed and I don’t know if we will ever know the truth.
Right on schedule.
Of course, there can be no comments on an ongoing criminal investigation. This scam was honed to a pure science during the Clinton Administration.
This should delay any disclosures until well after The President is out of office.
Why would A.Q. attack the mission when they were/are the beneficiary of the gun-running operation, makes NO sense!
FBI showed by purpose up weeks after the attack and the place ransacked by the attackers and others!!
No perpetrators have been arrested, yet known who they are!!!
Most likely they would spill the beans of Admiral Lyons scenario, and that would make some “big” heads roll. It’s also said they shouted: “Morsi sent us”???
Then you probably don’t agree either that SCOTUS had a secret visit by the Chicago-GODfather-Mobsters “twisting John Roberts’ mind with scenario of Andrew Breitbart, Bill Gwatney, Michael Hastings and a bunch of other dead persons???
Yes, actually. I believe that johm roberts was completely compromised and threatened.
“Why would A.Q. attack the mission when they were/are the beneficiary of the gun-running operation, makes NO sense!”
It makes sense. dan, if the op was planned for a far more dark and sinister reason...which I believe it was.
Agreed on the former SEALs at the annex...
The Tripoli forces were ordered to do something other than go to Benghazi - effectively but technically not a stand- down.
For all assets outside of the country, they were denied ability to go to Benghazi through negative response. As long as there was no action taken by the President to allow them to go, they had to stay put. (also effectively a stand down, but there was no order needed.)
For out of country assets to help in Benghazi, Obama, and only Obama would have had to sign off, literally.
.......excellent post!
Good that makes me feel much better!!!
Yeah - like the "workplace violence" we saw at Fort Hood. This is merely "worldplace violence".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.