So someone who hates Libertarians is defining for us what a Libertarians really should be and what he thought Reagan really meant?
Wait, I’m out of popcorn. I’ll be back.
Yeah, this one will be entertaining. As one of the site’s token libertarians (please note the lower case “l”, haters) I’ll throw out the next bit of red meat and tell the conservatives here that if you want to overcome the demographics challenge in front of you, you’re at least going to need the libertarians to negotiate with the anarchists for you.
So someone who hates Libertarians is defining for us what a Libertarians really should be and what he thought Reagan really meant?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yep. I’m good that way. I can explain anything.
(lol)
Reagan was no libertarian, see post 17, Reagan is no mystery to many of his here, and a single throwaway line to a libertarian audience during a campaign does not rewrite history and facts, nor the rest of that isolated, lonely interview itself.