To: Borges
What if the same fact pattern occurred last year, rather than two millennia ago? The Roman Empire dissolves in the interim, with Israel and Italy gaining sovereignty over Judea and Rome, respectively. Israel's constitution adopts the Jewish laws that the Romans permitted in their province of Judea last year. Italy adopts the civil law system in force in the Roman Empire last year. All the protagonists were hit by lightning around Easter of this year and are unavailable to testify.
Does the plaintiff have a cause of action? ... theology aside.
To: Kennard
Pretty much everything would be barred by soverign immunity, actually.
Also, what standing does he have to sue? Does he claim to be the Nazarine’s next of kin?
26 posted on
07/31/2013 9:15:17 AM PDT by
Jewbacca
(The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
To: Kennard
Since the Roman government persisted in the Byzantine Empire, which was succeeded by the Ottomans, who were overthrown by Mustapha Kemal, it follows that he should actually be suing the Turkish government.
34 posted on
07/31/2013 10:48:47 AM PDT by
Bubba Ho-Tep
("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson