interesting read
1 posted on
07/22/2013 8:01:00 PM PDT by
knak
To: knak
Slavery, not just for black people anymore!
3 posted on
07/22/2013 8:11:40 PM PDT by
MtnClimber
(TEA Party, DOMA, Patriot, Constitution, 9/12, Anti-communist...There, come and get me zer0!)
To: knak
4 posted on
07/22/2013 8:13:34 PM PDT by
gitmo
( If your theology doesn't become your biography it's useless.)
To: knak
“The rights of the individuals are restricted only to the extent that they have been voluntarily surrendered by the citizenship to the agencies of government.”
City of Dallas v Mitchell, 245 S.W. 944
5 posted on
07/22/2013 8:21:13 PM PDT by
phockthis
(http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/index.htm ...)
To: knak
Stay calm folks! Traitor Mc is on the case!
6 posted on
07/22/2013 8:21:15 PM PDT by
LyinLibs
(If victims of islam were more "islamophobic," maybe they'd still be alive.)
To: Excellence
7 posted on
07/22/2013 8:21:55 PM PDT by
Excellence
(All your database are belong to us.)
To: knak
Could the Democrat Cartel finally be in serious trouble?
9 posted on
07/22/2013 8:31:51 PM PDT by
Rembrandt
(Part of the 51% who pay Federal taxes)
To: knak
IF the IRS were an individual, they would be presumed innocent.
Might I suggest that because they are instead an agency, they are entitled to no such presumption.
Instead, the IRS insistence they are accountable to no one should be grounds for disbanding this arm of the IRS.
No individuals from this arm shall be allowed future Federal Employment.
Any office subsequently chartered for this area of determination, regarding tax exempt status shall have open, transparent, and OBJECTIVE pass/fail criteria.
Said agency shall NOT be an arm of the IRS.
11 posted on
07/22/2013 8:40:54 PM PDT by
G Larry
(Let his days be few; and let another take his office. Psalms 109:8)
To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
16 posted on
07/23/2013 7:29:40 AM PDT by
SJackson
( The Constitution only gives people the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself. BF)
To: knak
I don’t support any type of income tax, even a flat tax, because it would leave the IRS and most of their hundreds of thousands of arcane rules in place.
17 posted on
07/23/2013 7:40:24 AM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(Inside every liberal and WOD defender is a totalitarian screaming to get out.)
To: knak
Despite that track record, in court on Friday, the IRS offered to waive this statutory requirement – if only Z STREET would abandon its effort to find out what the IRS’s policy about such applications has actually been. How nice. Except Z STREET did not bring this lawsuit as a way to find out if its application for tax exempt status was accepted or denied. Z STREET's doing this action on principle... something the IRS doesn't seem to understand. They're doing it for all groups - past and present - that could be stripped of their constitutional rights based on IRS whim...
The IRS is doing the equivalent of saying, "OK, we robbed you, now here's your money back. No reason to call the cops..."
18 posted on
07/23/2013 8:16:42 AM PDT by
GOPJ
(Department of Justice to Americans:'How many fingers am I holding up, Winston?')
To: knak
It is the second coming of the Star Chamber.
23 posted on
07/23/2013 10:24:01 PM PDT by
Eleutheria5
(End the occupation. Annex today.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson