To: Irenic
I would be surprised if his passport was withheld. He isn’t under indictment, so there should be no legal authority that can revoke his ability to travel.
To: Pearls Before Swine
well yes sir I know every thing is in order but something isn’t right for now so I need to delay an approval”.
To: Pearls Before Swine
If you go to democrat underground many of them believe George can be tried again and again until a jury convicts him.
They can see nothing wrong with that concept.
15 posted on
07/18/2013 2:40:29 PM PDT by
SWAMPSNIPER
(The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
To: Pearls Before Swine
I would too but we are living under the Obama administration, whatever they decide goes—goes.
21 posted on
07/18/2013 2:42:07 PM PDT by
Irenic
(The pencil sharpener and Elmer's glue is put away-- we've lost the red wheel barrow)
To: Pearls Before Swine
"I would be surprised if his passport was withheld. He isn’t under indictment, so there should be no legal authority that can revoke his ability to travel."I would think that if he is under investigation they could. Though any investigation is double jeopardy and unconstitutional, but that won't stop them.
50 posted on
07/18/2013 2:54:57 PM PDT by
DannyTN
To: Pearls Before Swine
Holder needs a legal authority?
52 posted on
07/18/2013 2:55:16 PM PDT by
arthurus
(Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINE http://steshaw.org/econohttp://www.fee.org/library/det)
To: Pearls Before Swine
He should leave the country while he legally can to some place that would not extradite him.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson