Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FredZarguna

Understood...

And by the same token, I would not cite an article about science from a theologian.
...”

Truth is truth no matter who quotes it, so I have to most respectfully, disagree.

If Hawkins makes a statement (public) he can be quoted to prove or disprove a argument.
Also a scientist can be a Christian, some of the first scientist were.
Science is the study of God’s creation, whether you believe in Him or not.

However, your comments are very good!!
:)


105 posted on 07/18/2013 11:56:40 AM PDT by kimtom (USA ; Freedom is not Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: kimtom
I would not cite an article about science from a theologian.

Your reply omits my reason for not quoting a scientist, which is the same reason for not quoting a theologian, and does not fundamentally disagree with yours; to wit, most scientists don't know anything about theology, and vice versa. Truth is truth no matter who quotes it, but the likelihood that a theologian will make a scientifically precise statement is -- unfortunately -- low, just as is the likelihood that a scientist would make a truthful observation about religion.

111 posted on 07/18/2013 12:05:46 PM PDT by FredZarguna (They Old School. We New School. We don't read cursive in New School. My Generation. We retahded, sir)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson