Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jurors start deliberating George Zimmerman case
Houston Chronicle ^ | 07/12/2013 | MIKE SCHNEIDER and KYLE HIGHTOWER

Posted on 07/12/2013 12:20:13 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

Edited on 07/12/2013 12:20:39 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

SANFORD, Fla. (AP)

(Excerpt) Read more at chron.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: jury; trayvon; trayvonmartin; zimmerman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: SeekAndFind

Breaking out the oil and uplula.


61 posted on 07/12/2013 1:54:09 PM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

Aeons ago, as a juror looking at a cafeteria of charges, first argument I made in deliberations was to the effect that the cafeteria was BS. If he did the deed, he was guilty of the most serious charge. If he didn’t do the deed, he was not guilty of any of it.


62 posted on 07/12/2013 1:56:07 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

I’ve been on 2 juries, both with men and women on them, and in both cases I came away very impressed with all my co-jurors. Everyone took their job very seriously and worked with each other to try to understand everything we had been told. In one case the defendent was clearly guilty of doing something wrong but the law book description of the two potential charges was unintelligible, and the only ‘explanation’ we were allowed was just a re-reading of the same crap, so we convicted her of the lesser charge. The other was simple - either the defendent was the armed robber on the security camera or he wasn’t, and either all the corroborating circumstantial evidence was just coincidence or he was guilty. He was guilty.
The only common theme with the two trials was the weakness of the judges, prosecutors and procedures and the strength of the defense attorneys and the jurors.


63 posted on 07/12/2013 1:56:22 PM PDT by Glenmore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I pray they find him not guilty. This was a joke of a trial.


64 posted on 07/12/2013 2:05:17 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Has anyone heard what the jurors were asking for? a list or something?

I just heard this on the radio and didn’t catch what they were asking for.


65 posted on 07/12/2013 4:10:59 PM PDT by 1_Rain_Drop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1_Rain_Drop

RE: Has anyone heard what the jurors were asking for? a list or something?

They asked for a list of evidence.


66 posted on 07/12/2013 5:15:55 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

thanks.


67 posted on 07/12/2013 5:29:43 PM PDT by 1_Rain_Drop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Is this what you may be asking. I am late to read tonight.
I think this video will answer your question:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dnV2bdbp3Fc&feature=c4-overview&list=UUvreJYGIC45aqkYOzmvShVQ


68 posted on 07/12/2013 8:11:23 PM PDT by Bronzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson