Anything based on emotions the outcome is wrong. It all depends how long they thought it through or if it’s a rash decision and they are sticking with it no matter what.
The same for men - their logic isn’t always correct - if it wasn’t thought through properly.
In any group, there needs to be at least one to be balanced and be able to communicate so either one can see/admit they may be on the wrong track.
I sure hope egos aren’t flying around that room - that will be disastrous. They want to be right instead of focusing on George and it’s about him. And trying to tell anyone that, when you basically don’t know them, their back can go up.
I believe men and women balance each other - I sure hope I’m wrong in this case and that it is an easy enough decision they can make together.
The same for men - their logic isn’t always correct - if it wasn’t thought through properly.
######
Agreed. The foreman in the Jodi Arias trial was using the wrong head to think with is a prime example.
I was on a jury once and the case involved a repeat DWI offender. The evidence was overwhelming that the guy was wasted beyond belief. One young female juror holdout wanted to vote not guilty. Her reasoning was....
“There have been times when I have been blasted out of my mind and I would hate to have to go to jail for that.”
She was convinced by the rest of us.