[rsflynn]

Thank you for saying that. Z did not break any law prior to the confrontation. Why do we keep hearing that he did not follow orders? It doesn’t matter in any way shape or form to this situation. Did he break a law before the scuffle? The answer to this question is no. He had as much right to walk on the same sidewalk as Martin did.

[Kansas58]

The “Saint Trayvon” crowd says, now, “George Zimmerman had no evidence that Trayvon broke any laws before following Trayvon Martin”

The “Saint Trayvon” crowd, simultaneously, says that George Zimmerman somehow “broke” some law by getting out of his vehicle, or by “following” Trayvon Martin. Neither of which are crimes at all.

The “Saint Trayvon” crowed justifies VIOLENCE by Trayvon, when no crime was committed by Zimmerman, yet that same crowd insists that Zimmerman was prohibited to perform legal acts in his attempt to notify police about Trayvon Martin?

---

“Thank you for saying that. Z did not break any law prior to the confrontation. Why do we keep hearing that he did not follow orders? It doesn’t matter in any way shape or form to this situation. Did he break a law before the scuffle? The answer to this question is no. He had as much right to walk on the same sidewalk as Martin did.”