Posted on 07/11/2013 4:59:59 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
“West argues that the state did not charge him with Manslaughter so it should not be in the instructions —
Judge decides otherwise.”
Well of course. I’m sure West was expecting that.
Excellent point.
OMG! That is too funny! :D
Assault out? Correct?
I’d like to see Nelson’s Skype talks from last night.
Yep.
he pulled something out...didn’t hear which one
Could MO be talking to people in higher places about this on going travesty or does that come only with appeal??
.bringing up child abuse..WTF????
>> letters have been placed in jurors chair to see if they want to be interviewed by media after verdict
That’s an outrage, putting that in the juror’s minds just prior to hearing closing arguments.
What's too funny? Why not paste the funny so everyone can laugh?
Has she included using profanity, screaming in a residential area, bleeding in a public place, laying on wet grass,......
Kathi Belich, WFTV@KBelichWFTV
The state also wants felony murder based in part on child abuse. Martin had just turned 17 before #Zimmermanon9 shot and killed him.
Let me give my definition of MANSLAUGHTER.........we have been watching a mans life slaughtered for the purpose of appeasing 13.5% of the US population, an appeasement that time and time has been proven to be impossible.
<< Did the misjudge just allow manslaughter? >>
Nah, she’s just waiting until the defense gets all their arguments out of the way before she verbalizes that decision, which she made weeks ago.
the one talking head (with Bill Schaefer) on LegalInsurrection said the one prosecution lawyer (Guy?) is really popular with the female jury, and you can see it based on how they respond to him.
****************************************************************
Maybe they liked the way that Guy got down on the foam doll.
Kathi Belich, WFTV@KBelichWFTV
The judge will include third degree murder as an option for the jury but not aggravated assault with a firearm. #Zimmermanon9
Yeah, I think of that line almost every day watching this trial. “He’s gotta be guilty of something! He shot an unarmed baby! He’s just *gotta* go to jail for sumpin’!” (As if fists and a sidewalk are not “arms” in the classical sense.)
That’s an outrage, putting that in the juror’s minds just prior to hearing closing arguments."
Wouldn't THAT alone be grounds for a mistrial? Jury tampering (intimidating, threatening, etc.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.