Seems to me, if the state (and judge) doesn’t want the evidence heard, they should have to prove that it was NOT Trayvon using his own phone. It’s not like it would be that difficult. They know how damning this evidence will be though.
They could subpena whoever the text msgs were sent to and get it from the horses mouth!
<< Seems to me, if the state (and judge) doesn’t want the evidence heard, they should have to prove that it was NOT Trayvon using his own phone. It’s not like it would be that difficult. They know how damning this evidence will be though. >>
Exactly. Assumed innocent until proven guilty. Assumed using his phone until proven he wasn’t.
Don’t ask me what that means on a deeper level. I have no idea. lol.