Posted on 07/09/2013 4:51:37 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
I have to wonder, as a Mom I can appreciate wanting to hear the 911 with the screams before it’s made public. So, my question is, did it come out clearly to the jury that doing so without LE is a BIG problem with this case? Or, would they just nod and say to themselves, I would want to hear it in private before it’s made public.
Not disputing what the correct way to do it, just asking if the jury understood the difference.
Mayor Jeff Triplett.
looks like it might be Mayor because he is out of town
Mayor up next, via video
>> Isnt the mayor white?
Yeah, I guess he is: http://www.sanfordfl.gov/index.aspx?page=80
I withdraw the question AND its innuendo, Your Honor!
MariJo Triplett...??? By Skype.
Next up via Skype is Sanford mayor Triplett.
Wasn’t sure on the spelling.
This should be interesting.
Oh no.....SKYPE! The Mayor should have been here.
Perhaps she meant "grate".
They will in closing arguments for sure. This leaves the defense a way to question their opinions that it is Trayvon.
Go Patty Go!
Lord, have mercy.
Another Skype witness.
“looks like it might be Mayor because he is out of town”
How convenient!
pd should not have released the tape to public until they had all family members hear it -oh by the way Tracy already heard it why was he in on this meeting/hearing? who else already heard it?
Is that Napoleon?
lol
it might be via Face Time on some apple product
Well, he was certainly able to listen to Bonapartes testimony. Not fair,
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.