Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: moehoward

WITNESS: “Those are my notes, you can’t copy them. I want them back. “

I hope the jury sees what I see. This guy makes it appear that he was not there. His own words condemn him.

Granted that he needed notes, because of the detailed info required and that he is being asked for. But that doesn’t change the fact that EVEN after SPENDING ALL NIGHT LAST NIGHT (his statement) PREPARING for and taking NOTES for his testimony today, HE can’t remember the simplest details like WHETHER HE WAS THERE, WHETHER HE REMOVED THE BAGS, etc.

WITNESS leading the court, demanding his notes back.


872 posted on 07/05/2013 8:56:44 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The monsters are due on Maple Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 826 | View Replies ]


To: UCANSEE2

IIRC, the DNA dude said the hoodie was in a plastic bag and any DNA was contaminated. This guy said “only paper allowed”. Person putting them in plastic would be immediately fired. Oops....I see a bus coming.


886 posted on 07/05/2013 8:59:44 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 872 | View Replies ]

To: UCANSEE2

He should have been taping his autopsy and having it typed up and that IS what happened. He signs the copy and it is FACT at that point. This is the most unprofessional display of incompetence I have ever seen.


895 posted on 07/05/2013 9:00:59 AM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 872 | View Replies ]

To: UCANSEE2; All
The last question for this ME should be...’You have no memory of the autopsy because you weren't even there for most of it, WERE YOU!
946 posted on 07/05/2013 9:16:19 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 872 | View Replies ]

To: UCANSEE2

>> Granted that he needed notes, because of the detailed info required and that he is being asked for.

I think it’s legitimate that he needs *something* to go from, on highly technical questions of fact from two years ago.

But wouldn’t that “something” be the autopsy report? And shouldn’t that report have EVERYTHING it needs to stand alone as a finding of the ME?

Rhetorical questions of course...


999 posted on 07/05/2013 9:28:51 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (Without GOD, men get what they deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 872 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson