Posted on 07/05/2013 4:54:41 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
Today, July 5th, is DAY #19 (of 4th week) State of Florida V. George Zimmerman case.
The State is expected to wrap up their case today – A great recap of the trial so far is available HERE: The key witness today expected to be Sybrina Fulton, mom.
Great Expectations? Remember, as y’all have noted during the 15+ months of research, there is so much corruption in the assembly of this case we could expect the State to avoid the traditional witnesses brought by normal prosecutions. We have not been disappointed in our predictions. The state has already won a pre-trial motion to bar the defense mentioning the absence of any witness from the State’s case.
So it comes as no surprise, not a single State investigator has been called, not a single FBI officer, only one local investigative detective, Chris Serino (who supported the defense), and now the profound possibility they won’t even present the Seminole County Medical Examiner. So has the State actually even proven that Trayvon is indeed, deceased? Without the M.E. the ballistics are essentially moot – where did the aforementioned bullet come from? They have not established it came from Trayvon’s body. Think about it.
Because of pre-trial ‘motions in limine’ to exclude the defense bringing it up, O’Mara cannot mention it. Would/Will the jurors notice a missing M.E. = Trayvon blood tox. etc?
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
You bet, on defense he’ll play the, “I don’t understand routine”....And they’ll probably have to bring in red Chinese interpreters and draw crayon pictures for him.
LOL — Sudden Inability To Understand English might be quite contagious in that courtroom today
Y’all are hilarious this morning...and thank you for it...I needed these laughs. Toooo funny pappy
I hope not! George Zimmerman needs to be acquitted. A mistrial means a 2nd trial and a free try for the state.
The defense would not make a motion to dismiss, but a motion for a directed verdict, that would be a not guilty verdict and would stop double jeopardy. However, would not prevent a civil which, BTW, I think is double jeopardy.
probably the reason for the second autopsy ... to cover his lazy ass on that which he didn't do himself the first go round
.
Hooray...I need to get in a short exercise and get a load of laundry started...I’m off work today...looking forward to cross of ME
Agreed. It’s the conclusions drawn that invite the most bias.
Science can teach you someone is nervous. it can not teach you if it’s because they are lying, intimidated, mentally ill, stressed, etc.
External factors help to draw those conclusions as well as their baseline behavior.
I am TRYING to not be biased, it helps no one..... But I CAN say that GZ had the worst (pre-court) body language ever! Someone has advised him to not move a muscle b/c of that.
Some people have bad body language. I know he does and i also think he’s 100 percent innocent and not deceptive at all.
But you haven’t taken Red Cross CPR in the last year. They no longer teach breaths.
LOL, Sybrina used the ploy a couple of times already today.
Premeditation can occur in an instant. If this medical examiner is correct, the kid was intentionally homicided.
No. He was intentionally shot. Whether GZ intended to kill him is not known with certainty. What is known is that GZ wanted to do something that would end the beating. In retrospect, you can be sure that GZ would rather have had TM survive.
Watch the biased government judge...When defense comes back, she’ll side with the govenrment prosecution on every objection...
Since it sounds as if you are english impaired, let me explain. Homicide is one person taking the life of another, even if it is intentional as it is in this case of self defense. That does not make it murder.
they are the govt ... especially a florida judge
.
Back in the day, the testimony from the autopsy surgeon was accurate, medically correct, and limited to the facts. How things have changed.
.
Fabulous you’re off work today!
We must see the cross examination of this ME!
He’s been nothing but a lackey for the prosecution -— hitting every speculative point as “fact,” what with his garbled interchange of definitions.
I agree. I'm convinced of that now.
He was killed intentionally. Legally, it’s not the same as “intent to kill”. It’s a quick way to say “He was killed because he was intentionally shot”. IOW not an accident.
Back in the day, the testimony from the autopsy surgeon was accurate, medically correct, and limited to the facts. How things have changed.
*****************************************************************
It’s a rare government employee now who is anything other than a statist. The state is their de facto god.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.