LOLOLOLOL
Posted on 07/05/2013 4:54:41 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
Today, July 5th, is DAY #19 (of 4th week) State of Florida V. George Zimmerman case.
The State is expected to wrap up their case today – A great recap of the trial so far is available HERE: The key witness today expected to be Sybrina Fulton, mom.
Great Expectations? Remember, as y’all have noted during the 15+ months of research, there is so much corruption in the assembly of this case we could expect the State to avoid the traditional witnesses brought by normal prosecutions. We have not been disappointed in our predictions. The state has already won a pre-trial motion to bar the defense mentioning the absence of any witness from the State’s case.
So it comes as no surprise, not a single State investigator has been called, not a single FBI officer, only one local investigative detective, Chris Serino (who supported the defense), and now the profound possibility they won’t even present the Seminole County Medical Examiner. So has the State actually even proven that Trayvon is indeed, deceased? Without the M.E. the ballistics are essentially moot – where did the aforementioned bullet come from? They have not established it came from Trayvon’s body. Think about it.
Because of pre-trial ‘motions in limine’ to exclude the defense bringing it up, O’Mara cannot mention it. Would/Will the jurors notice a missing M.E. = Trayvon blood tox. etc?
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
Why do i get the image of Ratatouille in my mind here.
What for?
That sounds like the marxist state we are headed toward, guilty until you prove you are innocent.
“This witness is Bao, not Rao”
I don’t care. :o)
Mantei: 2 minutes of unaccounted for time
LOL. Sorry, just a little teasin’
Ya gotta give a guy credit for using the word “pluperfect.” It went downhill from here (but it was fun).
>> Mantei: shooting someone is evidence of ill will, spite and hatred
If I understood correctly, he’s quoting case law (and then adding his own high school drama class tone of voice ‘tude to it)
Emotion is much easier to spin and the MSM is not bound by truth. They can twist this story in any direction.
-——> The state is acting like it’s the Defense’s duty to prove its case!
He started with just that. Said because they are saying it’s self defense they need to prove it.
He’s noticeably light on backing up his “opinions” on case law.
If the head is split you must acquit.
Yep.
The state has this case all wrong.
Prove theirs.
Well... nothing else he is saying is the truth, so... ?
Barry has spoken. That’s all the prosecution needs.
I’m starting think the judge was hard on the defense all this time because she knew full well she was going to dismiss the case at this point... Am I on to something, or do I just sound drunk?
Right, you’ll have to scroll up see the whole conversation to understand why I asked.....
Can you imagine how many more thefts and murders there would be (by the Amish)... if everyone became afraid to BE a neighborhood watchperson now...due to this travesty of justice?
Imagine the evil that would be spawned as a result. More crime and mayhem. And notice how the left always seems to side with the criminals in this country...even going so far as to want to give convicted felons a right to vote (for them)?
Sounds like a quite deliberate goal, by the left, to me. I hope to God it doesn’t work.
Judges head up, very interested in prosecutions argument. Very perky, alert, unlike when she was doing paperwork, head down with the defense.
Stunning, isn’t it?
Where do they get these guys and this judge?
He hasn’t quoted any case law. He’s operating purely on emotion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.