Posted on 07/03/2013 5:16:54 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
Today, July 3rd, is DAY #18 (of 4th week) State of Florida V. George Zimmerman case.
Rather than recap yesterday, I want to draw attention to some issues – A great recap is available HERE:
Yesterday, we got the first view on the horizon of the mud about to get slung by the State toward the character of George Zimmerman – Things are about to get intense.
Also, the State probably wants the jury to hear Sybrina, TrayMom™ and tears, last in the line-up prior to the long mid-week holiday break - so heads up for her this afternoon.
Tracy probably will not testify – due to his on-the-record lies now visible in evidence.
Remember, there is so much corruption in the assembly of this case you can expect the State to avoid the traditional witnesses brought by normal prosecutions.
The state has already won a pre-trial motion to bar the defense mentioning the absence of any witness from the State’s case.
So if the Seminole County Medical Examiner, or any LEO is not called to the stand – O’Mara cannot mention it. M.E. = Trayvon Blood Tox. etc.
The Scheme Team has, in their desperation, blitzed the media and geography. Daryl Parks, and Jasmine Rand are doing as much Cable News as possible. Jasmine is the David Axelrod of their scheme. She is also a well skilled liar, and working hand in hand to assist and counsel with the State.
Jasmine is also simultaneously trying to coordinate the narrative of Rachel Jeantel with Rod Vereen. You now have: Natalie Jackson, Ben Crump, Darryl Parks, Jasmine Rand, and Rod Vereen all working together to protect their narrative.
According to her girls: Alicia Stanley – has also been physically threatened and extorted to keep her mouth shut. They, all of them, are in full tactical combat operational mode to get their lynching money.
There is NOTHING they will not do. N.O.T.H.I.N.G.
Bingo-—————
Will bookmark.
hummingbird
I see an unintended discharge coming
she has a face for radio
Oh gee, I’m just now getting to try to catch up in trial coverage.
But, I just saw where they’re going to try to say b/c he took criminal justice classes,.he knew the law?
That is ludicrous. I have a Masters degree in criminal justice, so do I need to be worried about if I’m accused of a crime, them using that against me to say I know how to set up the perfect crime? That is ridiculous! There is no way to remember all the minutia involved in a particular law. And transcripts also say that took Spanish I, II, III... And yet my preschooler knows more Spanish than I do! God, I hope I’m not held accountable for every detail of espanol simply b/c I made an A.
This is so prosperous...but if it’s allowed then TM’s transcripts and records should be admitted to show he didn’t have deadly intent that night.
“Someone needs to grab what the last witness wrote on change.org. It was on the live blog wft. HE WANTED JUSTICE for Martin.”
ROWGLMAO
Chris Farely in drag.
Good one. I too thinks she looks like a guy with a wig on.
West should give a copy of that book to Bernie after the trial and a coupon for free soft serve cones.
See comment 501 for link to petition he signed, but didn’t write. Blog was going crazy with this one. Sorry for confusion.
That is priceless!
He basically said that not everything in the book was discussed in class.
His bias doesn’t matter here because he was just a records witness and the whole thing was a disaster from a technical aspect.
Looks just like her...LOL.
Wow....the State finally got one of its points across.
The gun was actually fired!
LOL. I’ve trying not to pile on about her but with the MSM trying to make her some kind of combination MENSA brainiac and honest as Abe, I’ll post this I’ve been sitting on since I first saw her testimony. Watch during next recess;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWNJwSJh_WY
But alas, without an autopsy report how do we know it is the bullet?
But if she testifies to his character, doesn’t the defense have the option to call up all of his teachers, high school security, bus drivers, drug clients...and anyone else aware of his thug life?
At the top of the hierarchy is the charges. As things progress, certain claims are made. If they are not objected to and the objections are not sustained, they create below them child “subjects” that can be discussed via evidence and testimony.
Example:
Top justification: charge of second degree murder. Witness say’s defendent had made threats the week before. This creates child justification for determining if he made threats. The defence can now call character witnesses to testify that defendent was a mild mannered guy that actually LIKED the deceased and would never have threatened him.
Etc.
My feeling is that once someone says, on the stand, that Trayvon was a good boy that went to church on sundays and would not hurt a fly, they’ve justified the defence offering evidence to prove otherwise. It is very germane because the claim of self defense is being made and evidence has just been proffered to suggest that the guy who he was defending himself from had no motivation and would never attack. The defense gets to try to prove otherwise.
OF course, this is all IMO.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.