Posted on 07/03/2013 5:16:54 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
Today, July 3rd, is DAY #18 (of 4th week) State of Florida V. George Zimmerman case.
Rather than recap yesterday, I want to draw attention to some issues A great recap is available HERE:
Yesterday, we got the first view on the horizon of the mud about to get slung by the State toward the character of George Zimmerman Things are about to get intense.
Also, the State probably wants the jury to hear Sybrina, TrayMom and tears, last in the line-up prior to the long mid-week holiday break - so heads up for her this afternoon.
Tracy probably will not testify due to his on-the-record lies now visible in evidence.
Remember, there is so much corruption in the assembly of this case you can expect the State to avoid the traditional witnesses brought by normal prosecutions.
The state has already won a pre-trial motion to bar the defense mentioning the absence of any witness from the States case.
So if the Seminole County Medical Examiner, or any LEO is not called to the stand OMara cannot mention it. M.E. = Trayvon Blood Tox. etc.
The Scheme Team has, in their desperation, blitzed the media and geography. Daryl Parks, and Jasmine Rand are doing as much Cable News as possible. Jasmine is the David Axelrod of their scheme. She is also a well skilled liar, and working hand in hand to assist and counsel with the State.
Jasmine is also simultaneously trying to coordinate the narrative of Rachel Jeantel with Rod Vereen. You now have: Natalie Jackson, Ben Crump, Darryl Parks, Jasmine Rand, and Rod Vereen all working together to protect their narrative.
According to her girls: Alicia Stanley has also been physically threatened and extorted to keep her mouth shut. They, all of them, are in full tactical combat operational mode to get their lynching money.
There is NOTHING they will not do. N.O.T.H.I.N.G.
this witness is more honest than most so far
“You don’t have to wait until you are almost dead,” to invoke self defense.
If GZ had been allowed to open carry, would little Trayvon have thought twice about attacking an armed man?
Did he really? I missed that. He said Hi to George? Is that allowed?
Yes, yet another state-called witness that benefits the defense.
Yet another prosecution witness backfiring on ‘em....
Looks like the prosecution will have to impeach their own witness again.
Judge not happy with this description and its implication for the defense. Cautions jury again that law will be explained prior to deliberations.
It will be interesting to see if she attempts to leave anything out of the relevant laws ti be considered?
Can a jury request a printed copy of the law or an official law book for use in their deliberations?
Yes we know, we’re watching the teacher testify..lol
This witness is a NIGHTMARE for the prosecution..for all kinds of reasons..INCLUDING THAT HE IS BLACK.
This goes into the file of
WHAT WERE THEY THINKING....
Absolutely! This testimony (also) leaves reasonable doubt in the minds of the jury panelists that GZ acted in defense of his own life that night, IMO. So far, the state has NO case. But we knew that.
Thank you!!!
West actually doing a good job with this witness. He successfully defused objection that witness was to adress only what he taught rather than relates is general knowledge and opinions on the law.
I wonder id the pros will regret opening THIS door?
Sustained. Lol. F’ing planted judge.
Greta was ax’d yesterday by Bob Beckel is the state was bad law yers....Greta said no...it is a bad case
that is right in there w/ Al Bundy scorin 4 touchdowns in one game
OMG!! LOL Pros objecting to their own witnesses testimony. This is good.
Wow. She actually over-ruled an objection by the state. I’m stunned!
How many times has THAT question been asked during this trial? It's grasping at straws. Or almost comical inability and failure to foresee.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.