Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JoeProBono

I thought that neither side was permitted to bring an audio expert into the trial.


402 posted on 07/01/2013 9:31:23 AM PDT by meyer (When people fear the government, you have Tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: meyer
No. Two audio experts were precluded from giving testimony. Owen and Reich. In the process of rebutting Owen and Reich as passing the legal test for admissibility of expert opinion testimony in this case, the defense produced Nakasone (who testified today), French, Doddington, and Wayman. None of the defense experts is precluded from giving testimony.

The state called Nakasone because the state told jurors, during jury selection, that they would hear from an audio expert.

411 posted on 07/01/2013 9:34:24 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 402 | View Replies ]

To: meyer

I thought that neither side was permitted to bring an audio expert into the trial.
****************************************************************
It was the prosecutor’s supposed experts that, after the Frye hearing (hearing to determine the bona fides/credentials of a supposed expert witness), even this prosecution-friendly judge declared not eligible to testify as experts (since the Frye hearing showed that they were buffoons and not experts). Nothing was said about the defense experts who were apparently allowed.


415 posted on 07/01/2013 9:37:29 AM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 402 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson