Her response style was so obviously over-coached and unnaturally mechanical that I couldn’t even watch it all. Every response was the same: She would take somewhere between 1.5 and 2.0 seconds to drop her head to the microphone, always answer “Yes, that is correct”, pause another 0.5 seconds, look at the jury, and slowly back away from the microphone. That went on for an hour.
Her response style was so obviously over-coached and unnaturally mechanical that I couldn’t even watch it all. Every response was the same: She would take somewhere between 1.5 and 2.0 seconds to drop her head to the microphone, always answer “Yes, that is correct”, pause another 0.5 seconds, look at the jury, and slowly back away from the microphone. That went on for an hour.
****************************************************************
Yes, that is correct.
OK, I didn’t watch the video, and I seem to be getting two different views: She was a very professional witness, or she was unnaturally mechanical. I must say, I find your view of it a bit more persuasive.
I can’t stand sitting for hours and watching TV, so I rely on the willingness of Freepers to sit through this stuff and report on it.
She was coached to answer the question as tersely as possible and to not volunteer any info. Her husband is a Sanford cop btw.