1 posted on
06/25/2013 12:19:37 PM PDT by
Red Steel
To: Red Steel
OOOOh. The Slimes is not happy. That means we should all be.
2 posted on
06/25/2013 12:25:33 PM PDT by
fwdude
( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
To: Red Steel
NY Times is sad.
I’m not.
3 posted on
06/25/2013 12:26:12 PM PDT by
VanDeKoik
To: Red Steel
The slimes would like a vote for every NON citizen also.
4 posted on
06/25/2013 12:27:52 PM PDT by
mongo141
(Revolution ver. 2.0, just a matter of when, not a matter of if!)
To: Red Steel
Tomorrow’s headline:
Heroic Roberts Leads Brave Supreme Court to Legalize Gay Marriage
5 posted on
06/25/2013 12:28:19 PM PDT by
Tzimisce
(The American Revolution began when the British attempted to disarm the Colonists.)
To: Red Steel
“The problem with the invalidated formula, in our view, is that it does not cover all the jurisdictions that have imposed or tried to impose techniques like racially discriminatory voter I.D. laws. Such efforts have become widespread in areas not governed by the preclearance rule.”
How is the person behind the desk with the list of voters in front of him or her supposed to be able to tell if the person in front of them is indeed the person on the list??
To: Red Steel
The conservative majority on the Roberts Court issued another damaging and intellectually dishonest ruling today Shame they didn't last year on Obamacare...
7 posted on
06/25/2013 12:29:58 PM PDT by
apillar
To: Red Steel
While Democrats brazenly steal massive amounts of votes in every major election, the left is still trying to pretend that racial minorities in America are routinely denied the right to vote by racist officials in 'certain' states. Please. To liberals (including The New York Times) it's always 1936 and blacks are being lynched on a regular basis. This kind of rubbish was rightly thrown aside by the Supreme Court and so the left is whining, as always.
8 posted on
06/25/2013 12:30:46 PM PDT by
Jim Scott
To: Red Steel
But the NYT had nothing to say about White voter intimidation by Black Panthers in Philly, and the habitual voter fraud in Democrat precincts in northern cities.
9 posted on
06/25/2013 12:31:18 PM PDT by
txrefugee
To: Red Steel
The divide between the conservatives and the moderate liberals on the court was vivid today.Sheesh...No bias at the Slimes is there?
Conservatives and the moderate liberals.
11 posted on
06/25/2013 12:35:06 PM PDT by
jazusamo
("Mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent." -- Adam Smith)
To: Red Steel
This would not even be an issue today if the gutless republicans in 2006 had not gone along with a 25 year extension of this racist law.
But the mindless kissing up to blacks and white racists has really helped republicans do better in national elections - hasn’t it.
Why just recently in the last presidential election the black vote for the democrat plunged from 95% in 2008 to only 93% in 2012.
12 posted on
06/25/2013 12:36:38 PM PDT by
Iron Munro
(From nobody to senator, to Conservative savior,)
To: Red Steel
FUNYT. What about the “assault” on my health care by the SCOTUS? You commie piggies can’t get your way EVERY time.
14 posted on
06/25/2013 12:48:36 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(Osama tried and failed. Obama got it done.)
To: Red Steel
Shouldn’t the NY Times and other Marxists praise societies improvements made over the last 40 years? Hell, a black justice ruled on the case! Along with a wise Latina, a radical feminist, and an 80 year old communist hag.
15 posted on
06/25/2013 12:53:51 PM PDT by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
To: Red Steel
If anyone ever needed any proof that liberal, ivory tower, damned yankees hate southerners, here it is. They always have.
And they always will.
16 posted on
06/25/2013 1:33:25 PM PDT by
JamesP81
To: Red Steel
The NYT need not worry. Voter fraud is alive and well, and the dead will still cast their ballots.
To: Red Steel
A recent study by Morgan Kousser of the California Institute of Technology says that five-sixths or more of the cases of proven election discrimination from 1957 through 2013 have taken place in jurisdictions covered by the preclearance rule. This is an unbelievably disingenuous and misleading analysis. Of COURSE most of the cases of discrimination were in places covered by the act. The so-called voting rights act encouraged people to claim discrimination and it provided them assistance in doing so.
18 posted on
06/25/2013 2:07:00 PM PDT by
WayneS
(Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos...)
To: Red Steel
ID in PERSON = VOTE ONCE in ONE STATE.
Get rid of computerized voting which is more easily trumped than paper ballots. And I want a receipt.
To: Red Steel; et al
It eviscerated enforcement of the Voting Rights Act, in which Congress kept the Constitutions promise of a vote for every citizen.
Kindly show me in the constitution this promise.......well?
21 posted on
06/25/2013 4:56:33 PM PDT by
S.O.S121.500
(Any law repugnant to the Constitutuon is null and void.....ENFORCE THE BILL OF RIGHTS! It's the Law.)
To: Red Steel; Perdogg; Lurking Libertarian; JDW11235; Clairity; TheOldLady; Spacetrucker; ...
FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.
22 posted on
06/25/2013 9:13:37 PM PDT by
BuckeyeTexan
(There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson