Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Steel

“The problem with the invalidated formula, in our view, is that it does not cover all the jurisdictions that have imposed or tried to impose techniques like racially discriminatory voter I.D. laws. Such efforts have become widespread in areas not governed by the preclearance rule.”

How is the person behind the desk with the list of voters in front of him or her supposed to be able to tell if the person in front of them is indeed the person on the list??


6 posted on 06/25/2013 12:29:12 PM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cotton1706
The NYT wants the pre-clearance rules to be applied nationwide. It gives the DOJ and the federal government more control over the states.

This part of the Civil Rights Act should have been declared unconstitutional a long time ago. How can anyone justify treating nine states and selected counties in six other states differently than the rest of the country? It was a travesty that should have been ended a long time ago.

13 posted on 06/25/2013 12:37:22 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson