Why debate with an idiot?
Posted on 06/16/2013 4:38:44 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Sarah Palin energized a group of social conservatives at the Faith and Freedom Coalition’s Road to Majority Conference Saturday, blasting the Obama Administration’s apparent lawlessness, calling the current state of America “Orwellian,” and urging the United States to stay out of Syria’s chaotic and brutal civil war.
In comments to the Daily Caller, the 2008 candidate for vice president also declined to join many of her fellow Republicans in condemning National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden, saying the real problem was the government’s violation of Americans’ rights.
In her speech, Palin called the current political atmosphere, rife with scandals, a “a symptom of a bigger disease,” expressing outrage over the Internal Revenue Service’s targeting of conservative nonprofits.
“You don’t marginalize everyday, average Americans. Those, who are part of the Tea Party, that want to protect the constitution,” said the former Alaska Governor. “The IRS can’t figure out how it spent $4 million dollars on a training conference because it lost its receipts… really?”
The 2008 GOP Vice-Presidential nominee said President Obama has lost the trust of the American people.
“Like the other day,” she said ”[Director of National Security Intelligence James Clapper] bragging that they used the ‘least untruthful statement.’ Now, where I come from that is called a lie. Yes, the officials lied and government spied — and in Benghazi government lied and Americans died.”(continued)
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
Oh, I’m just enjoying the rapid-fire-posts from sissies.
It’s kinda like watching the trans-boy from Con Air. Real war going on and we have the transvestites dancing.
Keep up the sissie work! Zero is counting on you!
As usual, more high school BS from the lesser evil camp. Please can I have more? You do your cause a service, trust me.
More BS from a sad keyboard warrior. You are legend in your own mind. Keep making things up. It’s amusing.
And you don't have testicular fortitude enough to put that on your 'about' page.
You have to name names because I have provided the ethics by which I will judge each and every candidate.
#1. Can't be killin no babies. Or supporting that crap.
/johnny
Is it not astounding, the sound and fury?
They admire themselves as revolutionaries. They don’t understand where we got the term ‘narcissist’. Navel and pond-gazers.
I am crushed. Really. When a guy that can’t back up his posts wounds me so...well...it’s just too much to bare.
And you lack the intelligence to know when you are veing intentionally mocked.
You haven’t backed up yours. So now you go for obfuscation. Pathetic.
In the dark, if I've lost my glasses.. That's a step too far..
/johnny
Still waiting Henry.
Still waiting Norm. See how easy this is.
/johnny
You lied. I didn’t. Sucks to be you. Se how easy it is?
Please can I have more?
Chicken**** is a more succint term, but what you intrinsically lack is SITUATIONAL AWARENESS. You are OK with the camp being overrun by the enemy because you have a princess bitch with one or more of the general’s objectives.
And you want to elect people without principle.
Hell of an argument you got there hoss.
Yes, it is easy. But you can’t give me a name of a candidate. I would think that would be easy. But you’d sooner delude yourself with keyboard warrior fantasies.
Why debate with an idiot?
So where is the post I called for perfection? You keep avoiding that. Now show the class or be a liar. Your choice.
Well said. I apologize.
/johnny
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.