Replies

I'll stand on what I said,...
Well evidently not...

I don't think you've demonstrated she isn't conservative, nor that she isn't way closer to what you believe about immigration than McCain.
No problem. McCain is for Amnesty only he refused to call it that. Palin is for registration and legalization, but she also refuses to call it Amnesty. Yep huge difference. /s

Her only MAJOR foray into her stance on illegals came when she stood with the AZ law, those are her latest statements on illegals, and I have no problem with them, none whatsoever, and neither should you.
I don't have a problem with supporting Arizona's measure to protect itself against the negative impact of illegal immigration. It is good that Sarah supported that law. However, as stated before, which you still refuse to acknowledge, when it comes to immigration reform, Palin supports registration and the illegal being able to remain in our nation doing exactly what they have been before. Somehow you folks have gotten it into your head, that making illegals legal will solve all issues with illegal immigration. It won't. It merely makes them legal. It serves their purposes, and very few of our purposes.

1. Will the children of illegal still cause overcrowding at our schools?
2. Will illegals still get free health-care?
3. Will our schools still have to provide on campus exams and innoculations?
4. Our government be able to give even more programs to these people once they are legal?
5. Those who work under the table will be able to continue to do that. What income taxes?
6. These people will now be able to file for an income tax credit. Not paying in taxes, they'll be able to get paid to be here out of your tax payments.
7. Will Democrats get the votes of these people as they are transitioned to Citizens in about six years? Yes! We know who gets the votes of these people. It's already hard enough to get Conservatives elected today, and your fair haired favorite wants to make it worse.

Tell me how this makes it all go away..., I'm curious to know.

The Arizona plan is not a comprehensive immigration reform plan, so trying to act as if it replaces the announced views of Palin regarding a comprehensive immigration reform plan, is not rational.

So, does this mean we're not to endorse Cruz because he has no "comprehensive immigration reform plan"?
If Cruz makes public statements similar to what Sarah Palin has, it most certainly means we shouldn't support him. Rubio is now supporting a plan very similar to Sarah's announced plan. We rake him over the coals for it, but if I mention that this is what Palin has been advocating all along, you folks defend her. That is wrong. It's inconsistent.

Like I said, we're not going to agree on this, if she comes out for the new law, if she goes the way of Ryan, I'll change my mind.
Palin has never disowned her own public statements regarding what she wants to see done. And those plans are roughly the same as the plan working it's way through Congress today. We have dumped on Rubio for supporting it, and you folks give Palin a pass because she has only proposed her own plan that looks a lot like this one, but hasn't endorsed this plan that I now of. You folks are merely granting a pass to someone because you like them. The people you support should have to earn it, not be gifted it despite what they themselves say they support which is different than what you support.