[RIghtwardHo]

I’m more worried that people will take the Paul’s seriously.

[madison10]

I’m concerned that they will NOT take him seriously. This is not a joke and could very likely happen. We’ve stepped into a political sci-fi novel.

[EBH]

Sorry, I do take it seriously...in like NDAA “belligerent” act seriously...

This is where the NDAA of 2012 comes back to haunt us. Well, under the NDAA all it takes is to commit a “belligerent” act. Who defines what that is? The President of the United States. http://www.belligerentact.org/

Congress is taking up the issue of Snowden today. Will he be deemed a whistleblower or traitor. Feinstein has already tipped their hand. The argument is if by revealing what the NSA is doing did Snowden commit a ‘belligerent act?’ Did he compromise the security of the United States? If the President says he did...then he is an enemy of the state and subject to the provisions under the NDAA.

[SeminoleCounty]

I’m more worried that people will take the Paul’s seriously.

---

I’d be more worried people siding with Obama on this...Paul may be FrootLoops, but Obama is totally out of control

[American Constitutionalist]

" I’m more worried that people will take the Paul’s seriously."

Whether we should take Ron Paul seriously or not, a clock is right twice a day.
In just this one case Ron Paul is right.

[Absolutely Nobama]

The Paultards are currently praying to Allah hoping for yet another run in 2016.