Unit 2 closed due to a technicality (the license says that the plant must be able to operate at 100% power, but the plant wanted to run at 70% power on a shortened cycle to demonstrate that no new problems would occur). Unit 3 closed due to steam generators that required difficult repairs, or replacement, and the manufacturer (Mitsubishi Heavy Industries) did not provide a warranty for replacement power.
1 posted on
06/07/2013 8:15:11 AM PDT by
kidd
To: kidd
With plentiful natural gas available in any state that is smart enough to permit fracking, nuclear power plants are obsolete.
2 posted on
06/07/2013 8:17:26 AM PDT by
txrefugee
To: kidd
3 posted on
06/07/2013 8:18:22 AM PDT by
kidd
To: kidd
I'm shocked to hear this. Do I need the sarcasm tag?
To: kidd
neighbor states should tell CA to screw off.
Restrictions to produce power in CA have forced them to rely on power generated out of state.
To hell with CA!
9 posted on
06/07/2013 8:26:50 AM PDT by
G Larry
(Let his days be few; and let another take his office. Psalms 109:8)
To: kidd
Earth is now in a Nuclear Age, and I’d say that humans will soon come up with more reliable nuclear plants.
To: kidd
If the structures are ever torn down, will it be considered an industrial mastectomy?
12 posted on
06/07/2013 8:32:23 AM PDT by
edpc
(Wilby 2016)
To: kidd
The first concern of every good Californian should be on the welfare of the Spotted Owl. So the closing of this plant is a good thing. If ALL forms of modern energy collection could be removed from the state, then the path to paradise is assured.
And in case you're wondering what the SECOND concern of every good Californian should be, the answer is obvious:
MORE TAXPAYER-FUNDED HIGH-SPEED RAIL!!!!!!
14 posted on
06/07/2013 8:44:26 AM PDT by
Flycatcher
(God speaks to us, through the supernal lightness of birds, in a special type of poetry.)
To: kidd
Bad news. Going to be an interesting summer.
15 posted on
06/07/2013 8:49:56 AM PDT by
TheDon
(Inside Every Liberal is a Totalitarian Screaming to Get Out.)
To: kidd
Good luck with those power bills.
16 posted on
06/07/2013 8:50:22 AM PDT by
EricT.
(Another Muslim terrorist. Who saw that coming?)
To: kidd
Former SCE chair, founder of the Natural Resources Defense Council, and former Commerce Secretary John Bryson set this process in motion. The goal of
energy racketeering in California is to make money in carbon offsets.
20 posted on
06/07/2013 9:00:38 AM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(An economy is not a zero-sum game, but politics usually is.)
To: kidd
It’s going to be a long hot summer.
21 posted on
06/07/2013 9:02:14 AM PDT by
Dogbert41
(Thy Kingdom come!)
To: kidd
Another bonehead move by the liberals. We’ll all be throwing spears soon.
To: kidd
This would leave Diablo Canyon as the only nuke plant left in California. I guess California is going to have to get used to paying outrageous prices for electricity, and live with rationing of power and rolling blackouts. I live ten miles away from a hydroelectric dam, and my electric bill is dirt cheap, and I will encourage the locals to make sure it stays that way by supporting the local utility.
25 posted on
06/07/2013 9:17:19 AM PDT by
factoryrat
(We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
To: kidd
Isn’t the People’s Democratic Republic of California running a bit short in power generate capability?
26 posted on
06/07/2013 9:20:22 AM PDT by
Little Ray
(How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it gettingthe so hot?)
To: kidd
We need a video with the the Electric Nazi:
“no juice for you!”
30 posted on
06/07/2013 9:38:21 AM PDT by
nascarnation
(Baraq's economic policy: trickle up poverty)
To: kidd
As long as they can replace with natural gas, combined cycle with 50% thermal efficiency; rate payers should actually save.
But to depend on one primary fuel source, that is not stored at the generating plant; is risky. Pipeline failures do occur and we know what it is like to make improvements on pipelines.
32 posted on
06/07/2013 9:44:23 AM PDT by
cicero2k
To: kidd
So, if I read the article correctly, the San Onofre Reactors were done-in by DC, as in the Washington DC-based Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The NRC did not reject SCE's plan to restart Unit 2 at 70% because rejections can be legally appealed. Instead SCE was placed in legal and financial limbo through the politics of process-paralysis and deliberate bureaucratic slow-walking. As a result, I don't blame SCE for simply saying: "No mas!" '
33 posted on
06/07/2013 9:51:24 AM PDT by
Trentamj
To: kidd
California .... Please don’t ask Texas for any help ...
TT
54 posted on
06/07/2013 12:51:14 PM PDT by
TexasTransplant
(Idiocracy used to just be a Movie... Live every day as your last...one day you will be right)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson