Exactly the point (one point anyway) — those admin. apologists who claim the targeting was only bad “service” and not political targeting cannot explain why only conservative groups were singled out for such delays, scrutiny, and proctological exams.
If it were merely “bad customer service” then how did all the liberal-left oriented groups escape similar IRS attentions?
When we see the kinds of “progressive” groups allowed to skate along with tax-exempt status, including many that overtly seek to influence elections and candidates, it is obvious that the Obamacized IRS has been acting as a political arm of the Community-Organizer-in-Chief:
Don’t know what NAACP case that Eastman was talking about but it must have been a slap in Rangels face.
They claim liberal groups faced the same scrutiny but don’t seem to find any willing to testify.