Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Google ordered to hand private customer data over to FBI investigators
the guardian ^ | 6/1/2013 | Matt Williams

Posted on 06/01/2013 9:17:11 AM PDT by tobyhill

A US judge has ordered Google to comply with FBI secret demands for customer data, despite earlier ruling the warrantless orders unconstitutional.

District court judge Susan Illston this week rejected the internet search giant's argument that so-called National Security Letters (NSLs) violated its constitutional rights. As such it ordered Google to hand over private information relating to US citizens to federal agents.

It comes despite Illston earlier ruling the letters unconstitutional in a separate case in March. In that case, brought by non-profit advocacy group the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the judge said that such demands violated the right to free speech.

She also ruled against gagging clauses attached to the demands that prevent the recipients of NSLs from disclosing the mere existence of an order.

"The court concludes that the nondisclosure provision violates the First Amendment … the government is therefore enjoined from issuing NSLs … or from enforcing the nondisclosure provision in this or any other case," Illston concluded in March.

(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: tobyhill

Did they also ask for IRS agents data?


21 posted on 06/01/2013 10:08:23 AM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Time to ditch Chrome. I use DuckDuckGo as a search engine. Have a gmail account but don’t use it for anything important. Haven’t been able to 86 the android phone yet though.


22 posted on 06/01/2013 10:09:32 AM PDT by Victim O. Circumstance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Victim O. Circumstance

I use FireFox. I do use the Google search engine because it seems to be more thorough when I’m looking for a photo or graphic. I also like the fact that it allows me to see if there are larger sizes of a certain item, if I’m looking for a quality copy.


23 posted on 06/01/2013 10:12:16 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Funny thing happened on the way to the Constitution burning, Lefties rights were violated...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Victim O. Circumstance
Time to ditch Chrome. I use DuckDuckGo as a search engine. Have a gmail account but don’t use it for anything important. Haven’t been able to 86 the android phone yet though.

Consider "Startpage" as well, ditto that on gmail acct, only use google for pedestrian searches such as a pizza shops phone number...

24 posted on 06/01/2013 10:23:40 AM PDT by taildragger (( Tighten the 5 point harness and brace for Impact Freepers, ya know it's coming..... ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Victim O. Circumstance; DoughtyOne
For privacy, either of these search engines works well.

https://ixquick.com/

https://startpage.com/

25 posted on 06/01/2013 10:33:15 AM PDT by Jed Eckert (Wolverines!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Jed Eckert

Thank you.


26 posted on 06/01/2013 10:48:12 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Funny thing happened on the way to the Constitution burning, Lefties rights were violated...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: taildragger

I have used StartPage in the past as well. Another good option. I will use google at times but only for innocuous search subjects.

The smartphone is a problem though. Having to choose between Google, Apple and Microsoft when it comes to privacy is the height of ‘lesser of evils’. If Blackberry wanted to make a comeback, one marketing strategy highlighting respect for privacy could be effective.


27 posted on 06/01/2013 11:05:09 AM PDT by Victim O. Circumstance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

The Bill of Rights ain’t worth the parchment it’s printed on; Google should have known that.


28 posted on 06/01/2013 11:41:25 AM PDT by Jack Hammer (American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves

Facebook cooperated and sold their data to the IRS.

Catch me up on this please. I am 2 fingers away from going Galt on FB.

It took me awhile to even consider FB, but my relatives seem to like it because it was a good way to keep up collectively and email/phone was just too much of a bother. So I joined and now I hate it! I hate that I’m drawn to it, mostly political. I hate that I waste my time being political instead of enjoying what I thought it would be.


29 posted on 06/01/2013 11:54:16 AM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (0bama's agenda—Divide and conquer seems to be working.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U

I would have been gone a long time ago.


30 posted on 06/01/2013 11:55:44 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U

I just found this in my bookmarks.

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/05/the-irs-wants-you-to-share-everything-91378.html


31 posted on 06/01/2013 12:02:00 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (0bama's agenda—Divide and conquer seems to be working.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
A US judge (District court judge Susan Illston) has ordered Google to comply with FBI secret demands for customer data, despite earlier ruling the warrantless orders unconstitutional.

Take your pick, some actually make sense...

A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesman and philosophers and divines. With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his shadow on the wall. Speak what you think now in hard words, and to-morrow speak what to-morrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said to-day. — 'Ah, so you shall be sure to be misunderstood.' — Is it so bad, then, to be misunderstood? Pythagoras was misunderstood, and Socrates, and Jesus, and Luther, and Copernicus, and Galileo, and Newton, and every pure and wise spirit that ever took flesh. To be great is to be misunderstood.
Ralph Waldo Emerson, Self Reliance (1841)

Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead.
Aldous Huxley, "Do What You Will" (1929)

Consistency is a virtue for trains: what we want from a philosopher is insights, whether he comes by them consistently or not.
Stephen Vizinczey, "Good Faith and Bad"

Consistency is the last refuge of the unimaginative.
Oscar Wilde, "The Relation of Dress to Art"

Consistency is the enemy of enterprise, just as symmetry is the enemy of art.
George Bernard Shaw, "The Lure of Fantasy" (1991)

The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in the mind at the same time, and still retain the ability to function.
F. Scott Fitzgerald, "The Crack-Up" (2/36)

If a person never contradicts himself, it must be that he says nothing.
Miguel de Unamuno, "Godel, Escher, Bach" (1979)

Consistency requires you to be as ignorant today as you were a year ago.
Bernard Berenson, "Notebook" (1892)

Of course I'm inconsistent! Only logicians and cretins are consistent!
Tom Robbins, "Even Cowgirls Get The Blues" (1976)

A silly ass ... wrote a paper to prove me inconsistent. ... Inconsistency is the bugbear of fools! I wouldn't give a damn for a fellow who couldn't change his mind with a change of conditions.
John Arbuthnot Fisher, "The Royal Navy in the Fisher Era", 1904-1919.

I have forced myself to contradict myself in order to avoid conforming to my own tastes.
Marchel Duchamp, "Marchel Duchamp: Anti-Artist" (3/21/45)

The problem with being consistent is that there are lots of ways to be consistent, and they're all inconsistent with each other.
Larry Wall, perl6-language mailing-list

Psychotics are consistently inconsistent. The essence of sanity is to be inconsistently inconsistent.
Larry Wall, Usenet article (1998)

Inconsistently Yours,
GtG

32 posted on 06/01/2013 12:22:46 PM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Google will appeal this decision to a higher court all the way to SCOTUS?


33 posted on 06/01/2013 12:24:40 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gandalf_The_Gray

All of those people were just smashing words together. Pretty but then again none of them actually applies. The situations they describe, if any, are separated by time and space, and in fact allow that perfect alignment of fact must always produce perfect alignment of result. Anything else is madness. The judge is mad, or a tool, or a criminal. No alternative.


34 posted on 06/01/2013 12:35:16 PM PDT by BelegStrongbow (St. Joseph, patron of fathers, pray for us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U
Catch me up on this please. I am 2 fingers away from going Galt on FB.

Me too, but I have only anecdotal evidence. During a recent audit of my wife's business, the IRS agent confessed (perhaps accidentally) that one of the things that had triggered the audit in the first place was the perceived gap between our reported income and our apparent lifestyle as depicted in our Facebook photos.

All of our photo albums are set to Friends only - in theory, he should not have been able to see any of those pictures at all unless he A) bribed one of our friends (or they reported us to the IRS for a reward, which is not impossible), or B) was able to access "secure" areas of Facebook through a backdoor.

Given Facebook's revenue problems, I made the logical deduction that the company has started "selling" access to their vast archive of personal data to government agencies in return for favorable tax treatment or some other such benefit. When the IRS wants to investigate a particular individual, they are now free to go on fishing expeditions through your Facebook Timeline and photo albums.

The audit amounted to nothing, of course, since my wife's business is quite small - but my faith in Facebook's privacy settings is now at absolute zero.

35 posted on 06/01/2013 1:20:36 PM PDT by Mr. Jeeves (CTRL-GALT-DELETE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Jed Eckert

I use startpage.com and it’s the only search engine I use.


36 posted on 06/01/2013 1:25:23 PM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (November 4, 2008 and November 6, 2012.....Two days that will live in infamy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
In my opinion, this is all a show. Google has been in bed with the leftist regime from the beginning. I suspect that the information has already been shared, is being shared, and will continue to be shared until the jackass we have been supposedly waiting for is removed from office.
37 posted on 06/01/2013 1:32:11 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

http://www.ixquick.com try this one on for size.


38 posted on 06/01/2013 1:35:50 PM PDT by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation

Try mine.


39 posted on 06/01/2013 1:36:33 PM PDT by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

U.S. District Judge Susan Illston.


40 posted on 06/01/2013 1:40:56 PM PDT by JoeProBono (Mille vocibus imago valet;-{)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson