Replies

LOL!
Holder invited Fox News? For “off the record” nonsense?

It reminds me of the final episodes of ‘The Shield’ where the US Attorney offers Vic complete immunity from all crimes he may have committed in exchange for his testimony about something else. But first Vic had to honestly list all of his crimes. So when Vic sits down in the interrogation room with a recorder to list all the crimes he committed he starts reeling off murder and all kinds of crimes the US Attorney had no idea about. But it was too late - - Vic now had immunity.

Holder just wants to spill stuff that the Democrat “mainstream” newsrooms would then have to sit on lest they breach “off the record” confidentiality.

Was thinking along similar lines. I've never had any training in law other than a few Perry Mason episodes from the ‘60s. But what can happen if he spills his guts and admits to felonies and major crimes under the conditions he demands and a news agency publishes them? Will this evidence be admissible in court or are they opening a path to slither out of the situation? I know who we are dealing with. All parties involved. A corrupt AG in a corrupt administration. The news media who has been in lockstep 100%. Red flags are flying everywhere on the playing field.