Skip to comments.
Gay Manifesto - "We Shall Sodomize Your Sons" ["gay" fantasy come true?]
Rainbow Alliance ^
| 2/15/1987
| Michael Swift
Posted on 05/25/2013 2:03:42 PM PDT by Slyfox
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-137 next last
Forewarned - Rainbow Alliance is an anti-hetero site.
1
posted on
05/25/2013 2:03:42 PM PDT
by
Slyfox
To: manc
2
posted on
05/25/2013 2:04:06 PM PDT
by
Slyfox
(The red face of shame is proof that the conscience is still operational.)
To: Slyfox
These are sick, satanic bastards....and more proof for their deviant agenda.
3
posted on
05/25/2013 2:09:47 PM PDT
by
newfreep
(Breitbart sent me...)
To: Slyfox
To be fair, let’s include the first paragraph of the actual document, presumably deleted by whoever is putting this about as a statement of actual intent.
“This essay is an outré, madness, a tragic, cruel fantasy, an eruption of inner rage, on how the oppressed desperately dream of being the oppressor.”
Now I’m not saying this first paragraph necessarily changes the meaning of the whole document, people will have to make up their own minds on that, but is it indisputably dishonest to exclude it.
To: Slyfox
The Homo Manifesto forgot to include one item:
That all of those would be triumphant male homosexuals will suffer a miserable early death from Aids and other new STDs that turn up. Enjoy your "lifestyle" homosexuals -- while it lasts.
5
posted on
05/25/2013 2:11:57 PM PDT
by
StormEye
To: Slyfox
an we will kill you if we catch you doing it...
6
posted on
05/25/2013 2:13:42 PM PDT
by
Chode
(Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
Comment #7 Removed by Moderator
To: Slyfox
Does have a definite Nazi flavor.
To: Sherman Logan
Thanks for the clarification. Was about to employ some literary license and go fuel the chainsaw.
9
posted on
05/25/2013 2:15:26 PM PDT
by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist!)
To: Sherman Logan
I can tell you from YEARS of dealing with Earth First/ALF/Eco groups that such disclaimers are simply to give deniability WHEN one of the loons out there act on these ‘how to’ screeds.
Do not for a nanosecond believe that these things are fictional/fantasies.
To: Sherman Logan; newfreep
it just adds to it sherman that they are sick satanic bastards and people can shove tolerance
11
posted on
05/25/2013 2:16:46 PM PDT
by
bigheadfred
( barry your mouth is writing checks your ass cant cash)
To: Slyfox
"We shall conquer the world because warriors inspired by and banded together by homosexual love and honor are invincible as were the ancient Greek soldiers." I guess the writer doesn't see the irony in his own use of the past tense.
13
posted on
05/25/2013 2:17:34 PM PDT
by
Joe 6-pack
(Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
To: Slyfox
But when the religious right cites this text, they always omit the vital first line, which sets the context for the piece. In other words, every other version of this found on the net and in the literature of religious right political activists is part of the radical right's great lie about gay people. "This essay is an outré, madness, a tragic, cruel fantasy, an eruption of inner rage, on how the oppressed desperately dream of being the oppressor."
In fact, a "shocked, so very very shocked" congressperson read the article in the Congressional Record in 1989. Funny thing, though, the opening disclaimer was deliberately omitted.
According to this drama queen, the evil heteros forget the "Thooper Important" first line of the essay.
Just as the homosexual agenda takes everything Rush, or Beck, or a tv show, or a comedian says out of context, I, too then will decry, and denounce, and be offended at the fact that they said those words at all, whether they meant them or not!
Until I actually see, with my own eyes, an original print version, (which as a straight male, I NEVER will, thank you very much) I choose not to believe that first line ever existed. In reality, even if it did, it would be the least important line in the entire girlymanifesto.
14
posted on
05/25/2013 2:18:09 PM PDT
by
Captainpaintball
(Those who say the Constitution is a "Living, Breathing Document" do so because they want to KILL it.)
Comment #15 Removed by Moderator
To: Slyfox
After the Boy Scout fiasco I needed a good laugh.
16
posted on
05/25/2013 2:21:57 PM PDT
by
NKP_Vet
To: Sherman Logan
We all can make up our own minds about it's content - agreed. To delete it does not change the content. That is why I included the website. So, everyone can see for themselves where it came from and to whom it was intended. It was written for gays as a calling card to future action. At the time, Christian Coalition made a huge deal about it, testified before Congress and it was written into the Congressional Record. Shortly after that Christian Coalition began to receive legal difficulties instigated from one of the now Obama gang who is intending to rip us some new ones. (I will search for her name.)
What was written in 1987 should not surprise us in the least when we see what has happened to the media, nor to what has just happened to the Boy Scouts.
When I first read this back in 1987 I said to myself, "Will they try for 'Boy's Life Magazine'?
Little did I know how right I would be.
17
posted on
05/25/2013 2:22:14 PM PDT
by
Slyfox
(The red face of shame is proof that the conscience is still operational.)
To: Joe 6-pack
Yeh. I think he’s referring to the “invincible” Sacred Band of Thebes. Which was utterly wiped out by Philip of Macedon in 338 BC.
To: Slyfox
Wallowers in strong delusion... they’ve of course waved this away as a small minority of extremists... well guess what leads them around by their ding dongs, it’s the extremists (through which Satan works)...
19
posted on
05/25/2013 2:27:16 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(How long before all this "fairness" kills everybody, even the poor it was supposed to help???)
To: Sherman Logan
The first paragraph provided no additional context. Manifesto vs dreams of being the oppressor is redundant.
20
posted on
05/25/2013 2:27:21 PM PDT
by
KittenClaws
(You may have to fight a battle more than once in order to win it." - Margaret Thatcher)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-137 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson