Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Surprise: Obama Promotes Another Benghazi Scandal Player (What Did You Expect?)
Townhall.com ^ | May 24, 2013 | Guy Benson

Posted on 05/24/2013 1:03:46 PM PDT by Kaslin

Hey, if Susan Rice qualifies for a big promotion, why not Victoria Nuland?  She's the State Department spokeswoman at the center of the firestorm over the administration's Benghazi talking points -- and if the president has his way, she'll be movin' on up to Assistant Secretary of State:

The State Department spokeswoman who earlier this month found herself in the middle of the controversy surrounding key revisions to the Benghazi talking points appears to be in line for a promotion. The White House announced Thursday that President Barack Obama intends to nominate Victoria Nuland as assistant secretary for European and Eurasian affairs, a position that requires Senate confirmation...Nuland, who has served as the State Department spokesperson from 2011 until earlier this spring, came under fire from Obama administration critics last week after leaked e-mails revealed she raised concerns with the CIA-prepared talking points on the deadly terror attack last September 11. Specifically, Nuland asked that references to al Qaeda and previous CIA warnings about threats posed to U.S. diplomats in Libya be scrubbed from the document that was used by U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice on news talk shows to explain the administration's understanding of events in Libya.

Those confirmation hearings could get testy.  Nuland's contributions to the now-infamous talking points email chain provide the closest thing to smoking-gun evidence of a cover up.  She demanded that (accurate) assessments of terrorist involvement be scrubbed, along with references to (accurate) intelligence warnings about the deteriorating security situation in Benghazi  leading up to the attack .  Here's how ABC News described her insistence on misleading edits a few weeks ago:

In one email, previously reported by ABC News, Nuland said that including the CIA warnings "could be used by Members [of Congress] to beat the State Department for not paying attention to Agency warnings so why do we want to feed that? Concerned …" After some changes were made, Nuland was still not satisfied. "These [changes] don't resolve all my issues or those of my building leadership," Nuland wrote.

These two quotes alone demonstrate how Nuland was primarily concerned with denying Congress (accurate) ammunition to ask why State Department leadership had been derelict and negligent in advance of the deadly terrorist attacks.  "Why do we want to feed that?" she asked, apparently unconcerned with, you know, the truth.  She also specified that early rounds of alterations to the talking points were insufficiently bowdlerized, which was unacceptable to both her and her "building leadership."  To whom might she have been referring, I wonder?  Now, Obama would like to elevate Nuland to be among that same building leadership.  Loyal soldiers must be rewarded for protecting the castle, after all.  This move extends another middle finger to House investigators and the families of the Benghazi dead.  The message is clear: The president could not care less about what other people think about his administration's actions.  Indeed, it's such a non-scandal to the White House that they're conspicuously promoting its key players.  The arrogance and "you can't touch me" attitude speaks for itself.  This administration is out of control. 

Forget promotions, not a single person has been fired over the lethal Benghazi fiasco.  The handful of State Department officials who've been "disciplined" are still drawing paychecks, including the top "scapegoat," who was going to be reassigned to a new job as soon as the scandal "blew over."  Elsewhere on the accountability score card, at least five Benghazi attackers have been identified and located by the US government.  None of them have been detained, however, because the administration is trying to build a legal case against them that could hold up in a civilian American courtroom.  Madness. Meanwhile, the Congressional investigation is far from over.  The American people are largely supportive of Republicans' efforts to get to the bottom of the issue, which a majority calls "very important."  As the Washington Post puts it, based on their polling, "it’s not just Republicans up in arms about Benghazi. That’s a problem for President Obama."  I'll leave you with this headline from BuzzFeed:


House Democrats Dismiss Existence Of Obama Scandals

Apparently some of them didn't get the memo.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: benghazi; libya; nuland; obamascandals; sidewayspromotions; state; statedepartment; statedept; victorianuland
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 05/24/2013 1:03:46 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If Victoria was smart, she would decline...


2 posted on 05/24/2013 1:04:58 PM PDT by Cowboy Bob (Democrats: Robbing Peter to buy Paul's vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Surprise: Obama Promotes Another Benghazi Scandal Player (What Did You Expect?)

It's called BUYING THEIR SILENCE!

3 posted on 05/24/2013 1:05:58 PM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (Pray THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA will be delivered from the evil unGODly forces)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The Chicago Way, writ large.
4 posted on 05/24/2013 1:06:26 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (It is the sexual deviants who are the bullies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

That lard ass Nuland was caught red handed lying thru her teeth.
And Obama wants to reward her for that?
Anybody else noticing that lying lard ass has been AWOL from her job as
State Department Spokesperson?


5 posted on 05/24/2013 1:06:51 PM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

Is this more of Obama’s revenge ?


6 posted on 05/24/2013 1:09:30 PM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tilted Irish Kilt

It will be interesting to see how many Rino’s and Rats vote to confirm her.


7 posted on 05/24/2013 1:14:18 PM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I didn’t realize there was a slot for Assistant Secretary of State for Obfuscation and Coverups.


8 posted on 05/24/2013 1:15:29 PM PDT by omega4412
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: Kaslin

This is political suicide. Why give the Congress a chance to get another bite of the apple? She will be crucified. (Not that she doesn’t deserve it.) And who knows, maybe she can be forced to sing....


10 posted on 05/24/2013 1:20:17 PM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

ping


11 posted on 05/24/2013 1:20:48 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScaniaBoy

Se will be confirmed if the Senate has a say


12 posted on 05/24/2013 1:21:47 PM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: GeronL

Ah....my mistake. Of course it is the Senate that “handles” confirmations. Nevertheless, it will leave a mark if Senator Cruz et al can have a go at her.


14 posted on 05/24/2013 1:25:27 PM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty

I agree with the bribe aspect, but since she has to go before Congress for the appointment, why would they do that at this time?

Hoping she’ll get to answer questions before a more Dem panel and defuse the House investigation?


15 posted on 05/24/2013 1:26:18 PM PDT by wildbill (You're just jealous because the Voices tYou alk only to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Sometime in the not so distant future a plane with her on board will fall out of the sky. Ala Ron Brown.


16 posted on 05/24/2013 1:26:30 PM PDT by TADSLOS (The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: FReepers

Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can

17 posted on 05/24/2013 1:27:10 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (My faith and politics cannot be separated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Obama keeps promoting those involve in the scandals yet continue to deny any responsibility in any of them


18 posted on 05/24/2013 1:27:22 PM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
It's like the Mob, you have to commit murder and other crimes to advance in the ranks.

19 posted on 05/24/2013 1:30:23 PM PDT by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

Guess who is supporting this lying lard ass’s nomination?
McCain and Graham. Would have posted the article, but did not want to
duplicate. Google Victoria Nuland and you will see these two Rino’s supporting
her nomination.


20 posted on 05/24/2013 1:38:49 PM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson