He’s right:
http://nationalparalegal.edu/conlawcrimproc_public/PoliceInterrogation/WaivingFifthAmend.asp
It is important to note here that Teterman’s actions in the previous example do not prevent him from later asserting his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent regarding any future questions asked of him. The Miranda court held that the privilege is not waived “if the individual answers some questions or gives some information on his own, prior to invoking his right to remain silent.” Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 476 (1966).
You have put this to rest. I was in AZ at the time of my hearing. What I need clarified is a federal employee under oath before Congress.
That to me could have a different interpretation.
Right away the left will say that’s fine for a courtroom but what about testifying before Congress? I think they(taylor the III could tie it up if they want. However if they do that could prolong the entire irs probe. So in a way they are damned if they do and damned if they don’t.I don’t know if there are technical rules for taking the fifth,when it applies when it doesn’t when testifying before Congress.