Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: smoothsailing
She refused to answer questions. Yet she badly miscalculated. She began with a self-righteous opening statement claiming she did nothing wrong. Only after defending herself did she invoke her Fifth Amendment rights.

At what point can she be slapped with a charge of Contempt of Congress?

5 posted on 05/22/2013 12:29:27 PM PDT by Slyfox (The red face of shame is proof that the conscience is still operational.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Slyfox
At what point can she be slapped with a charge of Contempt of Congress?

I am not a lawyer; but, I would think that if she comes back, and still refuses to answer questions, then she would be in contempt of Congress.

67 posted on 05/22/2013 1:08:22 PM PDT by LibertarianLiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Slyfox
At what point can she be slapped with a charge of Contempt of Congress?

I think Lerner was being "too smart by half" with her statements and that she has been set up for a "Rope-A-Dope".

You cannot make self-serving statements under oath and then refuse to testify, asserting 5th Amendment protection.

Day v. Boston Edison Co., 150 F.R.D. 16, 21 (D.Mass. 1993):

“There is no question but that the privilege against self-incrimination can be waived, not only explicitly but also implicitly by failing to assert it. Thus if a witness who is compelled to testify,does, in fact, testify and during testimony reveals information instead of claiming the privilege,the witness can be said to have waived the privilege as to the information disclosed."

Lerner made statements prior to invoking 5th Amendment privilege and can be compelled to testify on those statements.

Yesterday, under oath, Lerner said:

“I have not done anything wrong. I have not broken any laws, I have not violated any IRS rules or regulations and I have not provided false information to this or any other congressional committee.”

So, Issa should subpoena her to reappear and to question her on those statements. If she answers, and it is found that she lied in her statements, she is open to perjury.

If she asserts 5th Amendment privilege and refuses to answer, she opens herself up for Contempt of Congress charges. Congress can also still find that she lied to them, even if she doesn't testify.

FYI: Rita Lavelle [Reagan EPA Official] was indicted for lying to Congress, convicted, served 6 months in prison, 5 years probation, and a $10,000 fine.

196 posted on 05/23/2013 5:33:54 AM PDT by Lmo56 (If ya wanna run with the big dawgs - ya gotta learn to piss in the tall grass ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Slyfox

In this case, Contempt of Congress is officially done by resolution, passed by majority vote of the House of Representatives.


198 posted on 05/23/2013 5:39:18 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson