Posted on 05/22/2013 2:46:23 AM PDT by rhema
.. and the way that’s overtly encouraged is nicely delineated in #12 above
Powerful. So well written.
This woman agrees on both points.
Hmmm...That is an interesting hypothesis you put forward. It does indeed seem, anecdotally, that it is usually women. Several cases come to mind, right now.
Makes sense to this girl (who does not, BTW, want to rule the world).
Have my Nomex laid out right over there on the table, and am somewhat surprised to have not needed it so far .. then again, it's early yet d;^)
She certainly fits the bill doesn’t she?
> We have a woman running the most powerful nation on earth - Valerie Jarrett.
Look where thats gotten us
You beat me to it...: )
Wouldn’t bother me too much if Palin unseated her plus she’s a lot easier on the eyes.
There are two structures of social hierarchy in this world: familes (with the extreme of tribalism) and government. Break down families and you have induced a demand for government.
If women ran the world, a major war would occur every 28-30 days.
I don’t care who unseats her just so long as they aren’t commies.
Sick and tired of commies! ugggggh!
What women lack in the capacity for the direct physically brutal violence of which men are capable, they make up for with their own capacity for viciousness, backstabbing, and dishonesty. Kipling was wrong; the "female of the species" is not more deadly (as a direct, unconstrained confrontation will show) ... just different. At their worst, men and women alike can be spectacularly ugly. It's called "original sin". Pick up a Bible and read all about it.
Civilisation (IMO) is the result of cooperative action between men and women (individually and in larger groups) trying to minimize the bad and accentuate the good. The so-called "battle of the sexes" is a direct assault on civilisation.
And all the men would go on a hunting, fishing and camping trip when it did.
Among Plains and Rocky Mountain tribes, this was precisely what happened. If they were lucky, when they got back, the wives would merely have beaten up on each other and nobody was seriously injured or dead.
I can imagine. In the close confines of a nomad camp, women would “synchronize” pretty quickly. I bet the braves would have kept bug-out bags packed all the time...
If you read the Bible, Old Testement law had the Women’s tents where they went during that time.
My bride at first thought that was horrible, and then realized it would mean the husbands weren’t around to make them mad.
Like the Children of Israel, many of these Tribes were displaced from their homelands and/or escaping slavery.
Just as one example, the Siouxian tribes lived in the Ohio River Valley before moving into the Plains. The Mandan branch pretty much took up farming where they left off because they moved to a remote area of the country (Missouri River Valley of present North Dakota) where they were left alone for the next 3-4 centuries.
The main body of the Sioux, on the other hand, took up the nomadic hunter-gather lifestyle because they took up closer and more desireable lands in modern day Iowa, Wisconsin and Minnesota where they were constantly being displaced by more aggressive tribes (such as the Chippewa) moving west.
That's a mistake.
Men in power have never ripped women's sex organs out for fun and politics. Women have. Read Robert Graves and some of the other scholars of pre-Indo-European Europe, or "Old Europe". There is a lot of dark stuff locked up in women, and the Communist International wants to use it.
When men have maltreated women (rape, murder) they've tended to die ignominiously. Not so the ancient priestesses who destroyed men on their altars on Midsummer's Night and at the end of the lunar year -- at the close of the ill-omened 13th month.
But don't go by me. Go on, read. It'll make your hair gray .... unless you're a woman with a hidden flavor for sadism, instrumentalism, and cruelty. Read up. Get a load of what The Grrrls have in store for you.
Yeah, there’s one significant drawback to that approach. They might reconsider fairly quickly.
Mother
Theresa?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.