Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FBI ID's Benghazi suspects - but no arrests yet [Obama opposes using military to arrest them]
Associated Press ^ | May 21, 2013 | KIMBERLY DOZIER

Posted on 05/22/2013 12:50:20 AM PDT by grundle

WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. has identified five men who might be responsible for the attack on the diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, last year, and has enough evidence to justify seizing them by military force as suspected terrorists, officials say. But there isn't enough proof to try them in a U.S. civilian court as the Obama administration prefers.

(Excerpt) Read more at bigstory.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 05/22/2013 12:50:20 AM PDT by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: grundle

Another problem is that they can’t find anyone willing to go to Libya to read the suspects their Miranda rights... /sarc


2 posted on 05/22/2013 12:53:05 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob (Democrats: Robbing Peter to buy Paul's vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Our wonderful president doesn’t want to bother catching ‘em; after all, they only murdered four Americans.


3 posted on 05/22/2013 2:01:40 AM PDT by Jack Hammer (American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

I find the timing of this ‘fascinating’, as Lt. Spock would often say...


4 posted on 05/22/2013 2:52:19 AM PDT by Enduro Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Let’s not forget, these guys are also potential witnesses concerning the administration’s dealings in Benghazi.


5 posted on 05/22/2013 3:09:57 AM PDT by sonofagun (Some think my cynicism grows with age. I like to think of it as wisdom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

0 is afraid of what that might say.


6 posted on 05/22/2013 3:28:06 AM PDT by hadaclueonce (dont worry about Mexico, put the fence around kalifornia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hadaclueonce

If you think about it seizing them and having them come to trial is riskier than sending in the troops who may bring back nothing more than how the terrorists died.


7 posted on 05/22/2013 4:00:02 AM PDT by wiggen (The teacher card. When the racism card just won't work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: grundle

They are Obama’s partners.

WHY WOULD HE Arrest THEM?


8 posted on 05/22/2013 4:03:39 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Vi veri veniversum vivus vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

If arrested, they can sing.

The anti Obama/Hillary chorus already has too many voices. To add more, very well tuned voices would be harmful to the stage.


9 posted on 05/22/2013 4:09:08 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 .....Obama Denies Role in Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

In the minds of jihadis, the weakness shown here is taken as an INVITATION to attack.


10 posted on 05/22/2013 4:14:40 AM PDT by wayoverontheright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Obama wants these terrorist murderers to go free, otherwise he would have them arrested for trial by a military court. These are Obama’s people. He is one of them.


11 posted on 05/22/2013 5:36:18 AM PDT by Rapscallion (In Benghazi they died; Obama, Clinton and Rice lied. God may forgive. I do not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson