Posted on 05/20/2013 11:05:57 AM PDT by Houmatt
Kaitlyn Hunt, 18, had her entire life before her. Graduation. College. Job prospects. The high school senior was just preparing to start her life when she found herself expelled and slapped with criminal charges over her engagement in a same-sex relationship. And what started as a relationship between two young women has snowballed into a legal battle that could land Hunt in prison.
The story has many twists, turns and oddities. And so far, only one side that of Hunt family is being told. The high school senior apparently met her girlfriend, who is now 15-years-old, on the school basketball team at Sebastian River High School in Sebastian, Florida; the two began dating at the beginning of the school year.
(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...
Wow, the apologists coming out here make this thread sickening...
Can’t even count the contradictions, outright lies/misleads/redirects...
I think I am spotting at least 1 plant that is not who she claims to be (from her own contradictions).
I already said that Jesus was opposed to homosexuality. He was also opposed to adultery. There would be any number of criteria whereby Jesus would have objected to what went down with these two - but he wouldn’t have seen either one as a “child” so the quote about the millstone wouldn’t be applicable and it is a total misrepresentation of the meaning of the Bible to say that he would consider one a “child”.
Do you think the Bible is a “living document” to be interpreted by the standards of today - or do we go with original intent?
Yeah. Sad to find out FR has been infiltrated by pedophile apologists.
Ok, I’ll try again. Some Romeo and Juliet laws are written so that the actual birthday doesn’t matter. What matters is the difference in actual age. It doesn’t matter if you turn eighteen on Jan 1st, for instance, what matters is the actual age difference...generally three or four years.
So, one person is always going to be “X” older than the other. Whether that’s today, tomorrow, or the day the oldest turns eighteen. IF the relationship is within that window of years, it stays legal when the oldest turns eighteen. If the difference in the ages in not within that window, the relationship IS NEVER LEGAL. This makes a lot more sense, and kids in high school should be made well aware of the law.
So it would be okay for, say, a 16 year old boy to molest a boy only one or two years young then he. Or a 16 year old girl to molest a girl 14, or a boy/girl combo. BTW much molestation begins with grooming, making friends, gaining trust, and then making the moves. Whatever the age of the predator.
Okay, you’ve made yourself clear.
Your arguments (if someone wanted to honor them by such a word) are specious.
BTW, your flying spittle gives you away.
Yeah, that a Catholic grandmother would support this stuff is not believable.
So a living document then. Fine. But maybe some of us should be free to understand the meaning of a document based upon original intent.
So far the flying spittle and inane and insane mischaracterizations have been from your side.
Someone talks about children killed with guns. I point out that most of these “children” were teenagers, and a lot of them were using guns in crimes. By your idiotic logic I must therefore support killing children with guns.
Yeah. Sure. Keep telling yourself that if it helps you sleep at night.
HUH?
I believe all molestation and NON-CONSENSUAL TOUCH a crime WHATEVER THE AGE.
I guess my question to you is do you believe all sexual activity between two consenting teens to be criminal behavior?
Read again. I don’t support any homosexual behavior. I don’t even support sexual behavior out of wedlock. It leads to godless abortion. Besides, both are sins.
I just don’t believe that going to law enforcement is the best way to parent our children. These parents made a big mistake, and will pay for it, dearly, I’m afraid.
bye
Chillun’ are well known for lying about sex.
Oh, so you think there should be no “stupid” age of consent laws?
BTW on the interent no one knows you’re a dog....
What do you mean?
Since the very day he showed up (I remember happening to see his first comment), he’s been an enemy of social conservatives and many other tenets of conservatism as well.
A huge thank you.
Stop baiting me.
I believe there should be no age of consent laws THAT ARE STUPIDLY WRITTEN.
Some are well written. Some are not.
Bye.
You were never a chil’?
Hmm, many child molesters claim that their victims like the sex, or even "ask for it". Molestation includes grooming, befriend, engendering trust, and then often the use of porn/drugs/alchol, and voila! It's consensual.
And for a "Catholic Grandmother" you are certainly getting hot under the collar defending a homosexual predating on a young teenage girl.
Odd.
Your point is 100% unclear. Say what you are getting at, because I have no clue.
This thread is not about guns, or teenage gang bangers killing each other with guns, or what the Bible says about homosexual predation of the young. And I didn’t mischaracterize you one single bit. You did it all to yourself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.