Picture is date stamped 9/11/12 7:26:28PM
WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?
Apparently, rule of law and constitution are now "irrelevant facts" to these leftists.
Ping.
OK then let’s come at this from different direction...where was Reggie Love?
the truth will out
Wallace’s questions aren’t offensive Obama is.
“Irrelevant fact” in the Washington Beltway Dictionary is defined as “something very important and revealing”.
was the boy with Reggie???The link has a transcript of the Q&A. Recommended (quick) reading for everyone who comes to this thread. This guy refuses to answer a very simple question, throwing everything at it except a simple answer.
the "I don't know" President only knows... basketball picks.
Playing a little one-on-one with Reggie Love— dribbling the ball, shooting around, trying to touch the rim.
Barack Hussein Obama: “Pot had helped, and booze; maybe a little blow when you could afford it. Not smack, though...”
Being “kept up to date” could be now more than that drug abuser ignoring or laughing at the person who walked into the room to tell him what was happening in Benghazi.
Just goes to show they will try anything now just to keep the questions of gun running to terrorists off the radar. This is an admission to have investigators look this way rather than that way.
Still, Benghazi is the key. Just how bad was the whole truth if they are willing to open themselves up to all this other incredibly bad scandals?
Where Obama was, physically, is a largely irrelevant fact. With the technology at his disposal he can do what he needs to do from wherever he is located.
The relevant question was not asked by Wallace. That is “upon hearing of the attack on Benghazi and through the hours that followed, did Obama give any orders and if so, what were they?”.
The list, Ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise.
Picture is date stamped 9/11/12 7:26:28PM
“Were they denied requests for help during the attack?” he asked... .
[snip]
“Well, we are finding out exactly what happened,” the president again said. “I can tell you, as I’ve said over the last couple of months since this happened, the minute I found out what was happening, I gave three very clear directives. Number one, make sure that we are securing our personnel and doing whatever we need to. Number two, we’re going to investigate exactly what happened so that it doesn’t happen again. Number three, find out who did this so we can bring them to justice. And I guarantee you that everyone in the state department, our military, the CIA, you name it, had number one priority making sure that people were safe. These were our folks and we’re going to find out exactly what happened, but what we’re also going to do it make sure that we are identifying those who carried out these terrible attacks.”First of all this is the first time I have heard Zippo saying this. Second, everything he says after the first directive is in past tense. He is cornered and has no telepromter. I believe he was AWOL after the 6PM email that stated that the attack had stopped and the consulate cleared.
I say this for two reasons. At 10:00PM Hillary released a press statement that reads;
I condemn in the strongest terms the attack on our mission in Benghazi today. As we work to secure our personnel and facilities, we have confirmed that one of our State Department officers was killed. We are heartbroken by this terrible loss. Our thoughts and prayers are with his family and those who have suffered in this attack.In her statement she mentions speaking with President Magariaf no doubt asking him for military support because POTUS was AWOL and she could not order Military action. It is being reported today on Fox that the request for help at the annex was denied because the station chief was waiting for Lybian help that of course never came.This evening, I called Libyan President Magariaf to coordinate additional support to protect Americans in Libya. President Magariaf expressed his condemnation and condolences and pledged his government’s full cooperation.
Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet. The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind.
In light of the events of today, the United States government is working with partner countries around the world to protect our personnel, our missions, and American citizens worldwide.
“National Security staff” = Valerie Jarrett. Joint Chiefs are second in line after her...
Sub-Driver ~:” Pfeiffer then argues that Wallace’s questions about the president’s handling of the Benghazi terror attack are “offensive.”
Since when is dereliction of duty (sworn duty) not offensive ?
Since when is abandoning your post not offensive ?
Since when is ‘failure to act’ , or failure to uphold your position as CIC, or failure to prevent a murder not offnesive ?
These’s a statement that just screams coverup. If it is indeed ‘irrelevant’ - much like Obama’s college applications, etc - why not simply state where he was and be done with it? They refuse to do so because the revelation would be worse than the coverup.