Replies

The ROYAL question is WHY?

I have thought about this for months. Only one answer come to mind. Obama/Clinton made a political calculus....what is more potentially politically dangerous....To save the Americans, making obamas past statements that "al Quaeda is on the run" an obvious lie, or cut all 36 Americans loose to the terrorists, then have a ceremony, calling them all dedicated servants, heroic in all ways, placating their families with words, telling them lies, and then moving on.

ONLY ONE THING RINGS TRUE. OBAMA/CLINTON WANTED ALL OF THE AMERICANS TO DIE. DEAD PEOPLE DO NOT TALK. DEAD PEOPLE DO NOT BECOME WHISTLE-BLOWERS. DEAD PEOPLE CAN BE DESCRIBED ANY WAY OBAMA WANTS TO DESCRIBE THEM WITHOUT BEING CONTRADICTED.

OBAMA/CLINTON WANTED ALL OF THE AMERICANS IN BENGHAZI TO DIE. Nothing else makes sense.

Texas Songwriter~:” OBAMA/CLINTON WANTED ALL OF THE AMERICANS IN BENGHAZI TO DIE. Nothing else makes sense.”

Or ,.. State Dept. employees taken prisoner in exchange for “the Blind Sheik”
The electorate has never abandoned the chief Executive in times of crisis.

But you are right : History is written by the survivors ,
and history rarely is written by the deceased

Another smoking gun is WHY did the FBI wait almost 8 MONTHS to issue photos of the suspects? Why the excessive delay in announcing this, other than to appease the Benghazi hearing players that they were doing everything possible to apprehend the terrorists? Were these suspects supposed to kidnap Christopher Stevens and went beyond the scope of the plan?

If you are right, then we indeed are now living under a
genuinely fascist presidency, with the distinct possibility of being ever fascist in the future.

WE MUST reject them.

Good read:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html

Why

It was easily foreseeable that the way Benghazi actually worked out, it offered red meat to conservatives and independents to go after Obama and Clinton.

Clinton did not request that Obama authorize the FEST team to start a rescue operation. Obama did not authorize that a rescue operation be started. Thompson's FEST team was left standing there, stunned, prevented from doing their jobs. Obama has obviously been derelict in his sworn duty and Hillary has had to make sure that her own appointed commission did not talk to her just to hide the truth as best she can.

Even on 9/11/12 it was quite easy to figure out that dereliction of duty would not be a good thing politically for the derelicts.

Even if this event was a "terror" event that went against their political narrative of there being no al kada threat - them doing nothing was still worse for them politically than them giving their approval for a rescue attempt. Denying the rescue looks like dereliction of duty - leaving Americans in the field to die. At least attempting a rescue would make the entire 312 million-strong American population rally behind them and their popularity would soar. Just for trying. The only reason any conservative has anything bad to say about them is because the order was given to stop the rescue. All they had to do was say ok and they would have had enormous support from liberals and conservatives alike - we'd all rally 'round the flag.

So for two people so connected and sneaky to be too "dumb?" to say "do it" - that's simply unbelievable.

On the other hand, let's imagine another outcome, an alternate course of history. If the Ambassador had not died, but was taken alive (he was taken to a hospital that was controlled by terrorists), Obama and Clinton would have had a fantastic opportunity to negotiate for the Ambassador's release.

Testimony has not yielded this yet, but I do get 4 when I add 2 plus 2.

OBAMA/CLINTON WANTED ALL OF THE AMERICANS IN BENGHAZI TO DIE.

Which brings up the simple question of "Why?"

We can figure it was to cover something up which might have leaked and been injurious to the administration, but that asks more questions than it answers.

SO, beneath it all, the question is one of just what was going on in Benghazi that the administration wanted to eliminate the actors/witnesses?

That is the deeper layer to all this that won't be revealed if no one peels the skin off the orange. There must have been a lot more to the story than just throwing three dozen people to the wolves.

"I have thought about this for months. Only one answer come to mind.

Obama/Clinton made a political calculus....what is more potentially politically dangerous....

To save the Americans, making obamas past statements that "al Quaeda is on the run" an obvious lie,

or cut all 36 Americans loose to the terrorists,

then have a ceremony, calling them all dedicated servants, heroic in all ways,

placating their families with words, telling them lies, and then moving on.

ONLY ONE THING RINGS TRUE."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ You may have the workings of a new song here ...

OBAMA/CLINTON WANTED ALL OF THE AMERICANS TO DIE. DEAD PEOPLE DO NOT TALK. DEAD PEOPLE DO NOT BECOME WHISTLE-BLOWERS. DEAD PEOPLE CAN BE DESCRIBED ANY WAY OBAMA WANTS TO DESCRIBE THEM WITHOUT BEING CONTRADICTED. OBAMA/CLINTON WANTED ALL OF THE AMERICANS IN BENGHAZI TO DIE. + Nothing else makes sense.