Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: justiceseeker93; iowamark; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; BillyBoy

Only %4 less than Mitt got is great result given the ire against Sanford, it was all because of that, this wasn’t close enough for them to boast. The strongest possible candidate for the seat, Thurmond’s son, would have won by 20 points in this turnout, he didn’t run though.

Despite the smaller overall % than Mitt Sanford actually took every country in the district, Mitt lost 2 including Charleston.


72 posted on 05/08/2013 8:45:53 AM PDT by Impy (All in favor of Harry Reid meeting Mr. Mayhem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: Impy
Only %4 less than Mitt got is great result given the ire against Sanford, it was all because of that, this wasn’t close enough for them to boast.

Was the ire against Sanford only because of the well-publicized extra-marital affair or were there other reasons as well?

75 posted on 05/08/2013 9:14:43 AM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson