So being pro America first makes someone a communist, but being fro free and abusive trade with a Communist Empire makes you a patriot? Strange world you live in. Get help, go to rehab.
You are not being pro america first, you simply don’t realize it in your econ ignorance.
It’s being pro central planning that makes you a communist. And there are many parts of China’s economy that are now freeer than ours, and your ignorance of that makes you a typical lo fo.
Put me in with Reagan and Friedman:
One voice that is hardly ever raised is the consumers. That voice is drowned out in the cacophony of the interested sophistry of merchants and manufacturers and their employees. The result is a serious distortion of the issue. For example, the supporters of tariffs treat it as self evident that the creation of jobs is a desirable end, in and of itself, regardless of what the persons employed do. That is clearly wrong. If all we want are jobs, we can create any numberfor example, have people dig holes and then fill them up again or perform other useless tasks. Work is sometimes its own reward. Mostly, however, it is the price we pay to get the things we want. Our real objective is not just jobs but productive jobsjobs that will mean more goods and services to consume.
Another fallacy seldom contradicted is that exports are good, imports bad. The truth is very different. We cannot eat, wear, or enjoy the goods we send abroad. We eat bananas from Central America, wear Italian shoes, drive German automobiles, and enjoy programs we see on our Japanese TV sets. Our gain from foreign trade is what we import. Exports are the price we pay to get imports. As Adam Smith saw so clearly, the citizens of a nation benefit from getting as large a volume of imports as possible in return for its exports or, equivalently, from exporting as little as possible to pay for its imports.
The misleading terminology we use reflects these erroneous ideas. Protection really means exploiting the consumer. A favorable balance of trade really means exporting more than we import, sending abroad goods of greater total value than the goods we get from abroad. In your private household, you would surely prefer to pay less for more rather than the other way around, yet that would be termed an unfavorable balance of payments in foreign trade.
The argument in favor of tariffs that has the greatest emotional appeal to the public at large is the alleged need to protect the high standard of living of American workers from the unfair competition of workers in Japan or Korea or Hong Kong who are willing to work for a much lower wage. What is wrong with this argument? Dont we want to protect the high standard of living of our people?
The fallacy in this argument is the loose use of the terms high wage and low wage. What do high and low wages mean? American workers are paid in dollars; Japanese workers are paid in yen. How do we compare wages in dollars with wages in yen? How many yen equal a dollar? What determines the exchange rate? - MF
As the leader of the West and as a country that has become great and rich because of economic freedom, America must be an unrelenting advocate of free trade. - RR