Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wyatt's Torch
the participation rate has been declining for 15+ years so it's not a new phenomenon.

Well, more like almost 13 years but who's counting.

Leftists like to blame the decline in 2009 on retiring boomers, but it doesn't wash.  That boomer demographic anomaly was a birth boom from '46 to '64, a worker boom from '64 to '82, and we should have seen the retirement cause participation rate fall as a gradual decline starting in '93 and ending in 2011:

Whatever impact the boomers have had has been far overshadowed by the general economy.

115 posted on 05/08/2013 6:35:45 AM PDT by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


To: expat_panama
Yeah the boomers are still working and working longer. Participation rate for 55 and older is going up:

The real issue is the decline of women as the male participation rate has declined steadily since the 40's.

116 posted on 05/08/2013 6:54:29 AM PDT by Wyatt's Torch (I can explain it to you. I can't understand it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

To: expat_panama

One other thing, with the boomers being born from 1946-1964, if they retire at 65 wouldn’t the retirement boom be 2011-2029? 1993 would have been age 47 for the oldest boomer. That doesn’t seem reasonable to me.


117 posted on 05/08/2013 7:03:26 AM PDT by Wyatt's Torch (I can explain it to you. I can't understand it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson