Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: expat_panama

One other thing, with the boomers being born from 1946-1964, if they retire at 65 wouldn’t the retirement boom be 2011-2029? 1993 would have been age 47 for the oldest boomer. That doesn’t seem reasonable to me.


117 posted on 05/08/2013 7:03:26 AM PDT by Wyatt's Torch (I can explain it to you. I can't understand it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]


To: Wyatt's Torch
wouldn’t the retirement boom be 2011-2029?

That's right, spotted my math error & corrected the graph.  We're still seeing the boomer retirement as not explaining the sudden drop in '09.  Probably what we got is demographic and cultural forces controlling  trends over decades and economic forces governing over months.

120 posted on 05/08/2013 7:20:02 AM PDT by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson