President Obama is right on this. Why should we be involved in Syria?
Actually his anonymous adviser is right on this in your opinion. He would appear to originally have been wrong as you see it but is now coming around to your way of thinking.
Now you’ve done it. The neocons are staging a frontal attack on you right is very second.
“President Obama is right on this. Why should we be involved in Syria?”
Now there are two things Obozo and I agree on:
1. Let the Syrians kill each other.
2. We both like arugula,
I agree we have lost too many young men in these worthless wars
“President Obama is right on this. Why should we be involved in Syria?”
I agree. We shouldn’t be involved in foreign adventures unless there is some CLEAR U.S. economic or power interest, and then we should go in kick SERIOUS ass and then get the hell out.
Though given that almost every decision Obama has made as President has been antithetical to interests of working U.S. citizens and U.S. world power, he probably made the right decision for the wrong reasons.
I don’t disagree. But Zero has been running smack about “red lines” and trying to actually sound like he’s got a pair of testicles (other than Michelle’s) for weeks now. All of a sudden, when the feces impact the rotary ventilator, he goes “Uh...LOOK! SQUIRREL!”
}:-)4
Too bad he didn’t feel the same about Libya.
We need to stay out of Syria. We should have kept Obastard’s filthy grubs off of Libya, too. There is no national interest in getting involved in any of these third-world carpholes.
WRONG! You would have been 100% right ONLY if Obama had stated that from the beginning instead of creating some fake "red line" which he drew for North Korea and Iran.
Now OUR enemies are watching our response.
Like you I also do no think we should have gotten involved. But we are now, unless the words of the USA mean NOTHING in the world.
Central bankers want Syria to turn its nationally-owned central bank into a privately-held central bank, i.e., to be absorbed into the BIS/globalist realm.
This is what happened in Libya.
Terrorism works on behalf of globalism, however only the uppermost echelons of terror leadership realize who they’re really working for. Most just see ideology, money, power and lust. They do not know the private dealings of the leadership of their organizations.
“President Obama is right on this. Why should we be involved in Syria?”
Then say that. Don’t tell the American people how firm you are because your lap dogs, the Mediacrats will cover for you.
It isn’t he has no credibility. It’s the next President will have to clean up the mess.
Let them kill each other till the cows come home. There is absolutely no US strategic interest there. Not one more drop of American blood for muzzies.
The point isn't whether or not the US is involved in Syria, - the point is that the American people deserve a president that can actually take his own balls out of his mouth before speaking.
He shouldn't be writing a check his ass can't cover - ut he does it all the time so, you know, whatever . . .
Sadly, I agree. These people would as soon blow our heads off as look at us. They are destroying themselves. Why would we invest our blood and treasure to interrupt them?