[presidio9]

I see we've returned to the "You're a liberal" pretense. I take that to mean you don't have an intelligent reply to my point. Either you are pro-choice or you are an inconsistent libertarian. And that's the problem with libertarianism: Remove one card, and the whole philosophy falls apart. And that is why I am even bothering to have this conversation. I do the same thing on drug threads from time to time.

I'll save myself the trouble and cut and just paste rather than repeating myself:

you were too stupid/lazy to refer five posts back to the origin. Even when I tried to help you. Three times.

The quote you seem so fixated on was:

"I would vote for an honest pro-life democrat (if such a thing existed)..."

This is the third time I reposted it. Feel free to show me that "honest democrat you're thinking about." I am not aware of any.

While you're at it, I still dying to hear what I it was you said I was lying about in post 98.

BTW, I will be working on a term paper most of the weekend, so I am enjoying the occasional diversion.

You, on the other clearly need to at least try to make some friends. It's Friday night.

[TArcher]

>>I see we’ve returned to the “You’re a liberal” pretense.

Quack Waddle:

“Cheney Backs Key Element of Homosexual Agenda
Crosswalk ^ | Aug 26, 2004 | Susan Jones

Posted on 08/26/2004 10:58:47 AM PDT by presidio9

click here to read article “

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:SXLJk1EU4CYJ:www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1200175/posts%3Fq%3D1%26%26page%3D1+presidio9+homosexualagenda+site:www.freerepublic.com&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

presidio9: Idiot, Useful; 1 each.

[Dead Corpse]

You would rather vote for a pro-life Dem over a pro-life libertarian.

This says a lot about you...

None of it good.