Posted on 05/02/2013 4:07:23 PM PDT by presidio9
Addressing Planned Parenthood last week, President Obama made what must be one of the least self-aware statements of his tenure. "Forty years after the Supreme Court affirmed a woman's constitutional right to privacy, including the right to choose, we shouldn't have to remind people that when it comes to a woman's health, no politician should get to decide what's best for you," he said. "No insurer should get to decide what kind of care that you get. The only person who should get to make decisions about your health is you."
It's no secret that
(Excerpt) Read more at theatlantic.com ...
I'm not sure? Did they sign up for FR six months ago and then suddenly jump ass first into an ongoing conversation with a referrence to a random and completely unrelated thread from seven years ago?
Was Herman Cain a “noob”, or just pretending to be a conservative?
Someone, somewhere, must have told you once that you were interesting. You may have me confused with that person. Make your point, or don’t, I’m not here to do an interview with you.
Was Herman Cain’s campaign manager conservative, or was he just pretending too?
You seem very confused and/or disoriented to me. It sounds to me like you were having a conversation with someone about either Herman Cain, his manager or former Vice President Cheney. It wasn't me, and it certainly wasn't with anyone else on this thread that I know of. Personally I have no idea who Herman Cain's campaign manager is or was. Or even if he had one. If he did, he/she probably won't be hired by any other candidates in the near future.
Actually, it had to have been a "he" if you really think about it.
Are you sure you're on the right website?
Confused. LOL, Well I'm just trying to understand how it is that you were one of Cain's vocal supporters on FRand, having (bloviously) "posted 8000 articles", you can't tell us if Herman Cain's homosexual campaign manager, Scott Toomey, was pretending to be conservative or not.
Not sure where you're getting that from. If anything I was a Gingrich supporter. But thanks for taking such an interest in me.
"I was a Herman Cain supporter right up until the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel interview where he demonstrated an alarming lack of familiarity with foreign policy issues. I could care less whether he did or did not have an affair."
33 posted on 05/17/2013 1:52:51 PM PDT by presidio9 (Islam is as Islam does.)http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3020781/posts?page=33#33
you were one of Cain's vocal supporters on FR
Which I was not. But you might know that if you were here at the time. By all means go ahead ahead and back research all 30,000+ posts of mine if it gets you off.
If you must insist on hijacking this thread, let me help you out a bit: What I actually was a year ago (and before that if you must know) was a very vocal Gingrich supporter. That is not to say I did not also support Bachmann, Santorum, Perry for a while, and, yes even Cain. But Gingrich was always my horse, and my real candidate was "not Romney". See for yourself dumbass. I believe I may have coined the term.
Obviously I am have never been down with conservative litums tests. As a matter of fact, I find them idiotic. So, again, I know you're trying to be cryptic (something you have mistakenly confused with being clever), but if you have a point to make, make it.
What part of this statement are you having trouble understanding:
"Obviously I have never been down with conservative litums tests. As a matter of fact, I find them idiotic."
Perhaps I can help.
So you believe you can be ambivalent to adultery, support the homosexual agenda — and still be conservative?
That being said, you would not find me advocating in favor on adultry on this conservative political website. Furthermore, I don't endorse or support adultry. It's just not that high on my list of negatives when picking political candidates. All things being equal, I would favor the non adulterer.
So that’s a YES - you believe you can be ambivalent to adultery, support the homosexual agenda — and still be conservative.
If you are asking whether there are nominal conservatives who support gay marriage, but otherwise endorse conservative policy, undoubtedly there are. But that does not therefore make gay marriage a conservative position.
See, there you go Bloviating again.
There’s no IF.
That’s a YES - you believe you can be ambivalent to adultery, support the homosexual agenda — and still be conservative.
Could a homosexual be a conservative POTUS?
I will rephrase your question to help you out. It appears to be in two parts:
1) Is it possible to be gay and conservative?
Answer: Yes, there are undoubtedly gay conservatives.
2) Could a homosexual be elected president if he were otherwise conservative?
Answer: There is no law against it, but I don't think he would be likely to win the nomination.
That’s a YES - you believe you can be ambivalent to adultery, support the homosexual agenda — and still be conservative.
And as I have never advocated for gay marriage (or "the homosexual agenda" -if you must) I am scratching my head about what it has to do with me, abortion or libertarianism.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.