Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim from C-Town

It is settled eclesiatical law that the church (and most churches) love the sinner but hate the sin. A good lawyer, or even a mediocre one could easily point out the conflict between the church teaching and the school rules since to infer homosexual activity is not necessarily reasonable. My point from the beginning of this conversation is that such a suit could be very interesting.


53 posted on 04/25/2013 1:07:58 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Don't fire until you see the blue of their helmets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: muir_redwoods
No he couldn't. And no it isn't ecclesiastical law that one would allow an open, unrepentant sinner to avoid the consequences of that sin. In this case it is the loss of position, wages and all benefits that stem from that employment.

The lawyers who brought the case to the Supreme Court where slapped down like the simpletons that they are. The Constitution trumps local statute.

54 posted on 04/25/2013 1:25:01 PM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson